Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32822356›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Chlorination of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.

Laura Braun, Yasinta Daniel Sylivester, Meseret Dessalegne Zerefa, Muluwork Maru, Fiona Allan, Feleke Zewge, Aidan M Emery, Safari Kinung'hi, Michael R Templeton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofEnvironmental health insights · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inactivation ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura BraunDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-0859
Yasinta Daniel SylivesterNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Center, Isamilo Street, Ilemela, Mwanza, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-7924
Meseret Dessalegne ZerefaCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Arat Kilo, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-1462-5349
Muluwork MaruCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Arat Kilo, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-8060-9542
Fiona AllanWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Departssment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Feleke ZewgeCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Arat Kilo, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Aidan M EmeryWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Departssment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9028-8586
Safari Kinung'hiNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza Center, Isamilo Street, Ilemela, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Michael R TempletonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosomiasis is a water-based disease acquired through contact with cercaria-infested water. Communities living in endemic regions often rely on parasite-contaminated freshwater bodies for their daily water contact activities, resulting in recurring schistosomiasis infection. In such instances, water treatment can provide safe water on a household or community scale. However, to-date there are no water treatment guidelines that provide information on how to treat water containing schistosome cercariae. Here, we rigorously test the effectiveness of chlorine against Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.

methodS. mansoni cercariae were chlorinated using sodium hypochlorite under lab and field condition. The water pH was controlled at 6.5, 7.0 or 7.5, the water temperature at 20°C or 27°C, and the chlorine dose at 1, 2 or 3 mg/l. Experiments were conducted up to contact times of 45 minutes. 100 cercariae were used per experiment, thereby achieving up to 2-log10 inactivations of cercariae. Experiments were replicated under field conditions at Lake Victoria, Tanzania.

conclusionA CT (residual chlorine concentration x chlorine contact time) value of 26±4 mg·min/l is required to achieve a 2-log10 inactivation of S. mansoni cercariae under the most conservative condition tested (pH 7.5, 20°C). Field and lab-cultivated cercariae show similar chlorine sensitivities. A CT value of 30 mg·min/l is therefore recommended to disinfect cercaria-infested water, though safety factors may be required, depending on water quality and operating conditions. This CT value can be achieved with a chlorine residual of 1 mg/l after a contact time of 30 minutes, for example. This recommendation can be used to provide safe water for household and recreational water activities in communities that lack safe alternative water sources.

Indexed as

HalogenationAnimalsCercariaChlorineHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasisSnailsTanzaniaTemperatureWaterWater PurificationChlorineWater

Identifiers

PMID32822356
PMCPMC7467251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.