ArticlePloS one2020
Characterization of the Corynebacterium glutamicum dehydroshikimate dehydratase QsuB and its potential for microbial production of protocatechuic acid.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancement Strategy for Protocatechuic Acid Production UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Multi-step biosynthesis of the biodegradable polyester monomer 2-pyrone-4,6-dicarboxylic acid from glucose.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Catabolic and Anabolic Dehydroshikimate Dehydratases for 3,4-DHBA Production inMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Enhanced Protocatechuic Acid Production From Glucose UsingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dehydroshikimate dehydratase (DSD) from Corynebacterium glutamicum encoded by the qsuB gene is related to the previously described QuiC1 protein (39.9% identity) from Pseudomonas putida. Both QuiC1 and QsuB are two-domain bacterial DSDs. The N-terminal domain provides dehydratase activity, while the C-terminal domain has sequence identity with 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Here, the QsuB protein and its N-terminal domain (N-QsuB) were expressed in the T7 system, purified and characterized. QsuB was present mainly in octameric form (60%), while N-QsuB had a predominantly monomeric structure (80%) in aqueous buffer. Both proteins possessed DSD activity with one of the following cofactors (listed in the order of decreasing activity): Co2+, Mg2+, Mn2+. The Km and kcat values for the QsuB enzyme (Km ~ 1 mM, kcat ~ 61 s-1) were two and three times higher than those for N-QsuB. 3,4-DHBA inhibited QsuB (Ki ~ 0.38 mM, Ki' ~ 0.96 mM) and N-QsuB (Ki ~ 0.69 mM) enzymes via mixed and noncompetitive inhibition mechanism, respectively. E. coli MG1655ΔaroEPlac‒qsuB strain produced three times more 3,4-DHBA from glucose in test tube fermentation than the MG1655ΔaroEPlac‒n-qsuB strain. The C-terminal domain activity towards 3,4-DHBA was not established in vitro. This domain was proposed to promote protein oligomerization for maintaining structural stability of the enzyme. The dimer formation of QsuB protein was more predictable (ΔG = ‒15.8 kcal/mol) than the dimerization of its truncated version N-QsuB (ΔG = ‒0.4 kcal/mol).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.