ArticleJournal of registry management2019
Comparing Human Papillomavirus Prevalence in Rectal and Anal Cancer Using US Cancer Registries, 2014-2015.
Article in Journal of registry management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Rare Diagnosis of HPV-Positive Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a 59-Year-Old Heterosexual Woman: Implications for Screening Guidelines.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Cancers with epidemiologic signatures of viral oncogenicity among immunocompromised populations in the United States.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Temporal increase in the incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma in Kentucky and factors associated with adverse outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsRectal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare malignancy, and the causal role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in these cancers is thought to be similar to anal cancer. We compared type-specific prevalence of HPV in rectal SCC to anal cancer. In rectal SCC, we evaluated the agreement between HPV prevalence and positivity for p16, a marker of oncogenic activity.
methodsA stratified random sample of rectal SCCs and anal cancers diagnosed between 2014 and 2015 were identified from 3 statewide cancer registries in Iowa, Kentucky, and Louisiana. HPV testing was performed at the HPV laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HPV types were described using hierarchical attribution to HPV16 and other oncogenic types, weighted for sampling design. In rectal SCC, we computed concordance and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) between HPV status and p16 positivity.
resultsA total of 39 rectal and 72 anal cancers were analyzed. HPV16 was the most common type in both rectal and anal cancer and did not differ significantly between sites (71.4% vs 82.1%; P = .32). Concordance between the presence of any HPV type and p16 positivity in rectal SCC was 92% with κ = 0.77.
conclusionsRectal SCC and anal cancer have similar type-specific HPV prevalence, with HPV16 found most frequently. Substantial agreement between p16 and HPV status in rectal SCC lends additional support for the etiologic role of HPV in both anal and rectal cancer. Larger studies could be conducted to replicate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32822337PMC7864103W3080739816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.