ArticleBiometrics2021
Histopathological imaging-based cancer heterogeneity analysis via penalized fusion with model averaging.
Article in Biometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical structure-guided high-dimensional multi-view clustering.Journal of multivariate analysis · 2026Article
- Health Care Provider Clustering Using Fusion Penalty in Quasi-Likelihood.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2024Article
- Clustering on hierarchical heterogeneous data with prior pairwise relationships.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Bayesian finite mixture of regression analysis for cancer based on histopathological imaging-environment interactions.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Hierarchical cancer heterogeneity analysis based on histopathological imaging features.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Bayesian hierarchical finite mixture of regression for histopathological imaging-based cancer data analysis.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer. For various cancer outcomes/phenotypes, supervised heterogeneity analysis has been conducted, leading to a deeper understanding of disease biology and customized clinical decisions. In the literature, such analysis has been oftentimes based on demographic, clinical, and omics measurements. Recent studies have shown that high-dimensional histopathological imaging features contain valuable information on cancer outcomes. However, comparatively, heterogeneity analysis based on imaging features has been very limited. In this article, we conduct supervised cancer heterogeneity analysis using histopathological imaging features. The penalized fusion technique, which has notable advantages-such as greater flexibility-over the finite mixture modeling and other techniques, is adopted. A sparse penalization is further imposed to accommodate high dimensionality and select relevant imaging features. To improve computational feasibility and generate more reliable estimation, we employ model averaging. Computational and statistical properties of the proposed approach are carefully investigated. Simulation demonstrates its favorable performance. The analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data may provide a new way of defining/examining breast cancer heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.