Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32822084›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2021

Histopathological imaging-based cancer heterogeneity analysis via penalized fusion with model averaging.

Baihua He, Tingyan Zhong, Jian Huang, Yanyan Liu, Qingzhao Zhang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Health Care Provider Clustering Using Fusion Penalty in Quasi-Likelihood.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baihua HeSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tingyan ZhongSJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jian HuangDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Yanyan LiuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1405-7345
Qingzhao ZhangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Key Laboratory of Econometrics, Ministry of Education, The Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Integrated Cancer Modeling: A New DimensionR03CA241699 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2019 to 2020
$168k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R03 CA241699NIH HHS CA204120NIH HHS CA241699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer. For various cancer outcomes/phenotypes, supervised heterogeneity analysis has been conducted, leading to a deeper understanding of disease biology and customized clinical decisions. In the literature, such analysis has been oftentimes based on demographic, clinical, and omics measurements. Recent studies have shown that high-dimensional histopathological imaging features contain valuable information on cancer outcomes. However, comparatively, heterogeneity analysis based on imaging features has been very limited. In this article, we conduct supervised cancer heterogeneity analysis using histopathological imaging features. The penalized fusion technique, which has notable advantages-such as greater flexibility-over the finite mixture modeling and other techniques, is adopted. A sparse penalization is further imposed to accommodate high dimensionality and select relevant imaging features. To improve computational feasibility and generate more reliable estimation, we employ model averaging. Computational and statistical properties of the proposed approach are carefully investigated. Simulation demonstrates its favorable performance. The analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data may provide a new way of defining/examining breast cancer heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansheterogeneityhistopathological imagingmodel averagingpenalized fusion

Identifiers

PMID32822084
PMCPMC9367644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.