Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32822040›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Genome-Wide Mapping of DNA Methylation 5mC by Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP)-Sequencing.

Millissia Ben Maamar, Ingrid Sadler-Riggleman, Daniel Beck, Michael K Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cancers · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Comprehensive Toolbox to Analyze Enhancer-Promoter Functions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Millissia Ben MaamarCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Ingrid Sadler-RigglemanCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Daniel BeckCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Michael K SkinnerCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. skinner@wsu.edu.

Funding

EPIGENETIC TRANSGENERATIONAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR ACTIONSR01ES012974 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKINNER, MICHAEL K · 2005 to 2018
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation is a large scale purification technique. It enables the isolation of methylated DNA fragments for subsequent locus-specific or genome-wide analysis. Here we describe an immunoprecipitation protocol using a monoclonal mouse anti 5-methyl-cytidine antibody followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq).

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingCytidineDNADNA MethylationGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoprecipitationSequence Analysis, DNA5-methylcytidineCytidineDNADNA methylationEpigeneticsImmuno-precipitationMethylated DNA immunoprecipitationNext generation sequencingReview

Identifiers

PMID32822040
PMCPMC8285090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.