ArticleHNO2020
[Results of surgical and radiotherapeutic treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands].
Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Results of a nationwide survey on the treatment of salivary gland diseases in German hospitals].HNO · 2023Article
- Rare Diseases of the Salivary Glands and of Facial Nerve.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical treatment in patients with rare adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the salivary glands is considered to be the state of the art. With respect to an additional radiotherapy there are different approaches regarding the type of radiotherapy and timing. In this study the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in 52 individuals with salivary gland ACC who were treated at the University Hospital in Essen and received irradiation with fast neutrons and photons (mixed beam technique) either A) immediately following surgical treatment or B) only after the appearance of local recurrence were compared. Group A (n = 28, first diagnosis, FD September 1991-September 2009) received adjuvant radiotherapy immediately postoperative, group B (n = 24, FD June 1979-November 2001) underwent primarily surgical tumor resection according to the treatment regimen at that time and were irradiated only on the appearance of a local recurrence. In comparison to group B, patients in group A showed a lower recurrence rate and a significantly longer local relapse-free survival. Group B, however, showed a significantly higher overall survival. The frequency of distant metastasis occurred equally in both groups but the onset of distant metastasis was significantly earlier in group A. In general, overall survival was negatively influenced by distant metastasis. The local recurrence rate was very high after primary surgical treatment only. The immediate adjuvant high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiotherapy reduced the local recurrence rates. Irradiation after the appearance of a recurrence had a positive influence on overall survival. Overall, definitive high-LET radiotherapy in the mixed beam technique enabled high local control rates both primarily postoperative and also locoregional recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.