Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821977›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020

[Minimally invasive stabilization of sacral fractures].

S Decker, C Krettek, T Stübig

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. [Clinical study of percutaneous double-segment lengthened sacroiliac screws internal fixation via three-dimensional navigation technology in treatment of Denis type Ⅱ and Ⅲ sacral fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S DeckerKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Decker.Sebastian@mh-hannover.de.
C KrettekKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
T StübigKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacral fractures can be of traumatic origin and can also occur as insufficiency fractures. While the therapeutic target of mechanically stable insufficiency fractures is mainly pain relief, mechanically unstable insufficiency fractures and traumatic sacral fractures following high-energy trauma require biomechanical stabilization. Various surgical strategies are available for this, whereby minimally invasive techniques are now preferred whenever possible.

objectiveThis article presents the clinical challenges and options for minimally invasive treatment of sacral fractures. MATERIAL AND

methodsSelected important study data are discussed and our own treatment approach is presented.

resultsThe most important minimally invasive techniques for operative treatment of sacral fractures are presented: sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic stabilization and sacroplasty. The selection of the surgical technique should be made on an individual basis. While sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis is the international gold standard, diverse authors have also published minimally invasive techniques for lumbopelvic stabilization. The latter enables a higher mechanical stability. In contrast, sacroplasty should only be used as an alternative treatment in insufficiency fractures. Comparative studies of the described techniques are still missing.

conclusionAll surgical options have their indications. Nevertheless, the biomechanical stability which can be achieved differs widely. Therefore, an exact analysis should be carried out of what is necessary with respect to reduction and retention and what should be achieved when treating sacral fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneFractures, StressPelvic BonesSpinal FracturesBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansSacrumFracture fixationInsufficiency fracturesPosterior pelvic ringSpinopelvic dissociationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID32821977
OpenAlexW3080489652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.