ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020
[Artificial intelligence : What do urologists need to know?]
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Digitalization in urology-challenge and opportunity].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Use of medical archives for research and patient care].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2022Review
- [Digital transformation in urology-opportunity, risk or necessity?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Review
- MRI and Targeted Biopsy Essential Tools for an Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment Decision Making in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past 10 years, the methods of artificial intelligence (AI) have experienced breakthroughs that have opened up a multitude of new fields of application for information technology. AI is particularly strong in those areas where patterns have to be recognized and conclusions and forecasts based on large, multiparametric data sets have to be drawn. Computers are superior to us in terms of precision and speed in these problems. These advances in information technology reach us at a time when innovations in diagnostics and sensor technology enable more precise patient stratification and confront medical personnel with an increasing quantity and quality of patient data. Urology is symbolic of this new complexity of medicine, in which multi-layered diagnostic cascades require a high degree of interdisciplinarity and, especially in uro-oncology, therapeutic strategies are becoming more differentiated and require the interpretation of multiple clinical and diagnostic data. Here, methods of Artificial Intelligence will in future support medical personnel in diagnostics and therapy decisions and thus come closer to the goal of precision medicine. A prerequisite for the success of AI-based support tools will be the transparent development and validation of the software, as well as the population-based visualization of decision parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32821957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.