Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821943›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Spacer acquisition by Type III CRISPR-Cas system during bacteriophage infection of Thermus thermophilus.

Daria Artamonova, Karyna Karneyeva, Sofia Medvedeva, Evgeny Klimuk, Matvey Kolesnik, Anna Yasinskaya, Aleksei Samolygo, Konstantin Severinov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daria ArtamonovaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Karyna KarneyevaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Sofia MedvedevaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Evgeny KlimukCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Matvey KolesnikCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Anna YasinskayaCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Aleksei SamolygoCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Konstantin SeverinovCenter of Life Science, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RURutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM10407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems provide immunity to foreign DNA by targeting its transcripts. Target recognition activates RNases and DNases that may either destroy foreign DNA directly or elicit collateral damage inducing death of infected cells. While some Type III systems encode a reverse transcriptase to acquire spacers from foreign transcripts, most contain conventional spacer acquisition machinery found in DNA-targeting systems. We studied Type III spacer acquisition in phage-infected Thermus thermophilus, a bacterium that lacks either a standalone reverse transcriptase or its fusion to spacer integrase Cas1. Cells with spacers targeting a subset of phage transcripts survived the infection, indicating that Type III immunity does not operate through altruistic suicide. In the absence of selection spacers were acquired from both strands of phage DNA, indicating that no mechanism ensuring acquisition of RNA-targeting spacers exists. Spacers that protect the host from the phage demonstrate a very strong strand bias due to positive selection during infection. Phages that escaped Type III interference accumulated deletions of integral number of codons in an essential gene and much longer deletions in a non-essential gene. This and the fact that Type III immunity can be provided by plasmid-borne mini-arrays open ways for genomic manipulation of Thermus phages.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacteriophagesGenes, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseThermus thermophilusRNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID32821943
PMCPMC7515739
OpenAlexW3080829054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.