Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821939›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of Remdesivir vs Standard Care on Clinical Status at 11 Days in Patients With Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christoph D Spinner, Robert L Gottlieb, Gerard J Criner, José Ramón Arribas López, Anna Maria Cattelan, Alex Soriano Viladomiu, Onyema Ogbuagu, Prashant Malhotra, Kathleen M Mullane, Antonella Castagna and 21 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 730 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
730citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04292730 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in Participants With Moderate COVID-19 Compared to Standard of Care Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorGilead SciencesRan2020 to 2020Enrolled1,113ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsRemdesivir, Standard of Care
NCT04970719 phase3withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Baricitinib Plus Remdesivir Compared to Dexamethasone Plus Remdesivir in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic DisordersRan2021 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsCOVID-19 PneumoniaArmsBaricitinib, Dexamethasone, Remdesivir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

730 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Cardiac Adverse Events and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Safety Analysis of the Randomized DisCoVeRy Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial

670 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Christoph D SpinnerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Robert L GottliebBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Gerard J CrinerLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
José Ramón Arribas LópezInstituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Anna Maria CattelanAzienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alex Soriano ViladomiuHospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Onyema OgbuaguYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Prashant MalhotraNorth Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York.
Kathleen M MullaneUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Antonella CastagnaIRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Louis Yi Ann ChaiNational University Health System, Singapore.
Meta RoestenbergLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Owen Tak Yin TsangPrincess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Enos BernasconiEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Paul Le TurnierUniversity of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Shan-Chwen ChangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Devi SenGuptaGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Robert H HylandGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Anu O OsinusiGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Huyen CaoGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Christiana BlairGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Hongyuan WangGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Anuj GaggarGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Diana M BrainardGilead Sciences, Foster City, California.
Mark J McPhailKing's College, London, England.
Sanjay BhaganiRoyal Free Hospital, London, England.
Mi Young AhnSeoul Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Arun J SanyalVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Gregory HuhnCook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Francisco M MartyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
GS-US-540-5774 Investigators

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Remdesivir demonstrated clinical benefit in a placebo-controlled trial in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but its effect in patients with moderate disease is unknown. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 5 or 10 days of remdesivir treatment compared with standard care on clinical status on day 11 after initiation of treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label trial of hospitalized patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and moderate COVID-19 pneumonia (pulmonary infiltrates and room-air oxygen saturation >94%) enrolled from March 15 through April 18, 2020, at 105 hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The date of final follow-up was May 20, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a 10-day course of remdesivir (n = 197), a 5-day course of remdesivir (n = 199), or standard care (n = 200). Remdesivir was dosed intravenously at 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg/d. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was clinical status on day 11 on a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from death (category 1) to discharged (category 7). Differences between remdesivir treatment groups and standard care were calculated using proportional odds models and expressed as odds ratios. An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates difference in clinical status distribution toward category 7 for the remdesivir group vs the standard care group. Results: Among 596 patients who were randomized, 584 began the study and received remdesivir or continued standard care (median age, 57 [interquartile range, 46-66] years; 227 [39%] women; 56% had cardiovascular disease, 42% hypertension, and 40% diabetes), and 533 (91%) completed the trial. Median length of treatment was 5 days for patients in the 5-day remdesivir group and 6 days for patients in the 10-day remdesivir group. On day 11, patients in the 5-day remdesivir group had statistically significantly higher odds of a better clinical status distribution than those receiving standard care (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.09-2.48; P = .02). The clinical status distribution on day 11 between the 10-day remdesivir and standard care groups was not significantly different (P = .18 by Wilcoxon rank sum test). By day 28, 9 patients had died: 2 (1%) in the 5-day remdesivir group, 3 (2%) in the 10-day remdesivir group, and 4 (2%) in the standard care group. Nausea (10% vs 3%), hypokalemia (6% vs 2%), and headache (5% vs 3%) were more frequent among remdesivir-treated patients compared with standard care. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate COVID-19, those randomized to a 10-day course of remdesivir did not have a statistically significant difference in clinical status compared with standard care at 11 days after initiation of treatment. Patients randomized to a 5-day course of remdesivir had a statistically significant difference in clinical status compared with standard care, but the difference was of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04292730.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdenosine MonophosphateAdministration, IntravenousAgedAlanineAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral Agentsremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID32821939
PMCPMC7442954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.