ArticleJAMA network open2020
Development of a Machine Learning Model for Survival Risk Stratification of Patients With Advanced Oral Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Prognosing post-treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer using structured data and machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Trial
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Distant Metastasis in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicentre Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Catastrophic Health Events in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review to Inform Risk Prediction.Cancers · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction model for long-term mortality after ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio Predicts the Post-surgical Prognosis of Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International dental journal · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Approach to Prognostication in Oral Cancer: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Navigating the landscape of personalized oncology: overcoming challenges and expanding horizons with computational modeling.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (1995-2025).Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Opportunities and challenges in pooling health-related quality-of-life data for prediction modeling in breast cancer across Europe: lessons from the EORTC BALANCE project.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Survival guided adaptive clustering enhances mortality risk stratification and radiotherapy guidance in early stage uterine sarcoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MRI in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Radiomic Approach in the Local Recurrence Evaluation.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Evaluating generalizability of oncology trial results to real-world patients using machine learning-based trial emulations.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- The current landscape of artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial surgery- a narrative review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a multimodal feature fusion-based model for predicting postoperative recurrence-free survival in locally advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- The efficacy and potential mechanisms of pyrotinib in targeting EGFR and HER2 in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: A tool for precisely stratifying postoperative patients with advanced oral cancer is crucial for the treatment plan, such as intensifying or deintensifying the regimen to improve their quality of life and prognosis. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based algorithm that can provide survival risk stratification for patients with advanced oral cancer who have comprehensive clinicopathologic and genetic data. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic cohort study, the elastic net penalized Cox proportional hazards regression-based risk stratification model was developed and validated using single-center data collected between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2011. In total, comprehensive clinicopathologic and genetic data (including clinical, pathologic, and 44 cancer-related gene variant profiles) of 334 patients with stage III or IV oral squamous cell carcinoma were used to develop and validate the algorithm in this 15-year cohort study. Data analysis was conducted between February 1, 2018, and May 6, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were cancer-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival. Model performance was compared in terms of the Akaike information criterion and the Harrell concordance index (C index). Results: Complete data were available for 334 patients (315 men; median age at onset, 48 years [interquartile range, 42-56 years]). The predictive models using comprehensive clinicopathologic and genetic data outperformed those using clinicopathologic data alone. In the groups of postoperative patients receiving adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the models demonstrated higher classification performance than those using clinicopathologic data alone in cancer-specific survival (mean [SD] C index, 0.689 [0.050] vs 0.673 [0.051]; P = .02) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (mean [SD] C index, 0.693 [0.039] vs 0.678 [0.035]; P = .004). The classification performance in distant metastasis-free survival was not different (mean [SD] C index, 0.702 [0.056] vs 0.688 [0.048]; P = .09). Conclusions and Relevance: A risk stratification model using comprehensive clinicopathologic and genetic data accurately differentiated the high-risk group from the low-risk group in cancer-specific survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival for postoperative patients with advanced oral cancer. This algorithm could be used through an online calculator to provide additional personalized information for postoperative management of patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.