ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Establishment and Comparison of Algorithms for Detection of Primary Angle Closure Suspect Based on Static and Dynamic Anterior Segment Parameters.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of anterior segment in primary angle closure suspect with deep learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Performance of anterior segment OCT-based algorithms in the opportunistic screening for primary angle-closure disease.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Machine learning-couched treatment algorithms tailored to individualized profile of patients with primary anterior chamber angle closure predisposed to the glaucomatous optic neuropathy.The EPMA journal · 2023Article
- Development of a β-Variational Autoencoder for Disentangled Latent Space Representation of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Development of angle closure and associated risk factors: The Handan eye study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Article
- Identification of the Optimal Model for the Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Rural Population: Handan Eye Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2022Article
- Detection of primary angleclosure suspect with different mechanisms of angle closure using multivariate prediction models.Acta ophthalmologica · 2021Observational
- Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To establish and evaluate algorithms for detection of primary angle closure suspects (PACS), the risk factor for primary angle closure disease by combining multiple static and dynamic anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) parameters. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional study. The right eyes of subjects aged ≥40 years who participated in the 5-year follow-up of the Handan Eye Study, and underwent gonioscopy and ASOCT examinations under light and dark conditions were included. All ASOCT images were analyzed by Zhongshan Angle Assessment Program. Backward logistic regression (BLR) was used for inclusion of variables in the prediction models. BLR, naïve Bayes' classification (NBC), and neural network (NN) were evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Data from 744 subjects (405 eyes with PACS and 339 normal eyes) were analyzed. Angle recess area at 750 µm, anterior chamber volume, lens vault in light and iris cross-sectional area change/pupil diameter change were included in the prediction models. The AUCs of BLR, NBC, and NN were 0.827 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.798-0.856), 0.826 (95% CI, 0.797-0.854), and 0.844 (95% CI, 0.817-0.871), respectively. No significant statistical differences were found between the three algorithms ( Conclusions: The three algorithms did not meet the requirements for population-based screening of PACS. One possible reason could be the different angle closure mechanisms in enrolled eyes. Translational Relevance: This study provides a promise for basis for future research directed toward the development of an image-based, noncontact method to screen for angle closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.