ArticleBDJ open2020
An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements.
Article in BDJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Different Modifications of Glass Ionomer Dental Restorative Materials in Primary Dentition: A ComparativeInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effect of Incorporating Date Seeds Microparticles on Compressive Strength and Microhardness of Conventional Glass Ionomer (anJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Effect of Zeolite Incorporation on the Ion Release Properties of Silver-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Changes in Gloss Alteration, Surface Roughness, and Color of Direct Dental Restorative Materials after Professional Dental Prophylaxis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of RMGIC/GIC Class V Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Effect of BiosilicateJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Surface Characteristics after Acidic Challenges.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Three Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Materials.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- BDJ Open (2019-2020) and the advantages of open access publishing.British dental journal · 2021Article
- Effect of Incorporating Chitosan to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Shear Bond Strength to Dentin (AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe last decade has seen a variety of modifications of glass-ionomer cements (GICs), such as inclusion of bioactive glass particles and dispensing systems. Hence, the aim was to systematically evaluate effect of mixing modes and presence of reactive glass additives on the physical properties of several GICs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe physical properties of eight commercial restorative GICs; Fuji IX GP Extra (C&H), Ketac
resultsBoth encapsulated GIC/RMGICs exhibited significantly improved mechanical properties in comparison to manually mixed equivalents, which in turn showed higher fluid uptake and early fluoride release (
conclusionsThe mixing mode and inclusion of reactive glass additives in cements had a statistically significant effect on physical properties of the selected GICs-RMGICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.