Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821423›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Exploring community perceptions in preparation for a randomised controlled trial of biofortified flour in Pakistan.

Usman Mahboob, Heather Ohly, Edward J M Joy, Victoria Moran, Mukhtiar Zaman, Nicola M Lowe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Usman MahboobKhyber Medical University, Phase V, Hayatabad, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
Heather OhlyUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2493-5834
Edward J M JoyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.
Victoria MoranUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE UK.
Mukhtiar ZamanRehman Medical College, 5-B/2, Phase-V, Hayatabad, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
Nicola M LoweUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE UK.
University of Lancashire · GBHayatabad Medical Complex · PKKhyber Medical University · PKUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofortification of staple food crops may be a cost-effective and sustainable approach to reducing micronutrient deficiencies in resource-poor settings with low dietary diversity. However, its success depends on uptake by the local population. This paper presents formative research conducted in a remote, rural community in North West Pakistan, prior to commencing a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of consuming zinc-biofortified wheat flour for alleviating zinc deficiency. It explored local community members' knowledge, understanding and attitudes towards biofortification and views on members of their community taking part in the trial.

methodsFour focus group discussions were conducted with male and female community members (separately for cultural reasons) and four in-depth interviews were conducted with Jirga members-respected male elders. Participation was limited to households that were ineligible for the trial so that we could explore the perspectives of community members who were not influenced by the incentives of the trial. Focus group participants were selected at community events for transparency. Data collection took place at the local school and homes of Jirga members. Thematic analysis was undertaken, using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to identify key themes.

resultsA total of 47 men and women participated in this study. Participants reported clear motivation to access and consume more nutritious flour, believing this would bring health benefits, particularly to women and children. Trusted members of the local community, including Jirga members and female health workers, should be involved in providing information on biofortified flour (and the trial) to increase levels of awareness and acceptance. Without their involvement, there is a risk that biofortified flour would be mistrusted. The cost of flour is the main factor affecting purchasing decisions, and biofortified flour will need to be cost-competitive to achieve widespread uptake in marginalised, rural communities.

conclusionThis formative study generated rich, qualitative data from a range of community stakeholders to improve the understanding of important barriers and facilitators to the widespread acceptability and adoption of biofortified wheat. Implementation research such as this will inform future decision-making in relation to scaling up biofortified wheat in Pakistan.

Indexed as

Adolescent girlsBiofortificationCommunityDeficiencyFormativeIronPakistanQualitativeZinc

Identifiers

PMID32821423
PMCPMC7433115
OpenAlexW3058039852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.