Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821421›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

A co-production approach guided by the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention for reducing sedentary behaviour after stroke.

Jennifer Hall, Sarah Morton, Jessica Hall, David J Clarke, Claire F Fitzsimons, Coralie English, Anne Forster, Gillian E Mead, Rebecca Lawton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Co-Development of the CoMUni Intervention: A Social-Media-Based Resource to Increase Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours in UK Undergraduates.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer HallAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8379-5555
Sarah MortonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4A, Edinburgh, UK.
Jessica HallAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
David J ClarkeAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Claire F FitzsimonsPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, St Leonards Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ UK.
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ UK.
Gillian E MeadCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4A, Edinburgh, UK.
Rebecca LawtonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBBausch Health (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke survivors are highly sedentary; thus, breaking up long uninterrupted bouts of sedentary behaviour could have substantial health benefit. However, there are no intervention strategies specifically aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour tailored for stroke survivors. The purpose of this study was to use co-production approaches to develop an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke.

methodsA series of five co-production workshops with stroke survivors, their caregivers, stroke service staff, exercise professionals, and researchers were conducted in parallel in two-stroke services (England and Scotland). Workshop format was informed by the behaviour change wheel (BCW) framework for developing interventions and incorporated systematic review and empirical evidence. Taking an iterative approach, data from activities and audio recordings were analysed following each workshop and findings used to inform subsequent workshops, to inform both the activities of the next workshop and ongoing intervention development.

findingsCo-production workshop participants (

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study that has combined the use of co-production and the BCW to develop an intervention for use in stroke care. In-depth reporting of how a co-production approach was combined with the BCW framework, including the design of bespoke materials for workshop activities, should prove useful to other researchers and practitioners involved in intervention development in stroke.

Indexed as

Behaviour change wheelCaregiverCOM-BCo-productionIntervention developmentSedentary behaviourStroke

Identifiers

PMID32821421
PMCPMC7429798
OpenAlexW3049073448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.