ReviewGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2020
The role of artificial intelligence in colon polyps detection.
Review in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer based on endoscopic images: A meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationPooled it
- Advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review of innovations in cancer diagnosis and management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of optimized logistic regression with state-of-the-art models for complex gastroenterological image analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Esophageal varices detection and bleeding risk assessment with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few decades, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved dramatically and is believed to have a significant impact on all aspects of technology and daily life. The use of AI in the healthcare system has been rapidly growing, owing to the large amount of data. Various methods of AI including machine learning, deep learning and convolutional neural network (CNN) have been used in diagnostic imaging, which have helped physicians in the accurate diagnosis of diseases and determination of appropriate treatment for them. Using and collecting a huge number of digital images and medical records has led to the creation of big data over a time period. Currently, considerations regarding the diagnosis of various presentations in all endoscopic procedures and imaging findings are solely handled by endoscopists. Moreover, AI has shown to be highly effective in the field of gastroenterology in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, and image processing. Herein, this review aimed to discuss different aspects of AI use for early detection and treatment of gastroenterology diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32821348PMC7417492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.