Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32821296›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2020

Successful treatment with avapritinib in patient with mucosal metastatic melanoma.

Emilia Cocorocchio, Laura Pala, Fabio Conforti, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Tommaso De Pas, Pier Francesco Ferrucci

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Tonsillar malignant melanoma presenting as sore throat and tonsillar mass: a case report and literature review].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilia CocorocchioDivision of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milano, 20141, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-6426
Laura PalaDivision of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ConfortiDivision of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Elena Guerini-RoccoPathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso De PasDivision of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Pier Francesco FerrucciDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic vulvar melanoma is a rare and aggressive disease and survival is usually poor. Vulvar melanomas harbor BRAF V600 mutations only infrequently; consequently, target therapy is a rare therapeutic option and immunotherapy usually has only a weak effect. On the other hand, KIT mutations are rare in cutaneous melanomas, but relatively frequent in mucosal melanomas, particularly in vulvar-vaginal melanomas, and can be a therapeutic target. Herein, we report a clinical case of a patient with metastatic vulvar melanoma, harboring an exon 17 c-KIT mutation, treated with avapritinib (BLU-285) - a highly potent and selective oral kinase inhibitor designed to treat imatinib-resistant gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) by targeting KIT/PDGFRα activation loop mutants (exons 17/18). After failure of the combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab first and then nivolumab alone, the patient received avapritinib 300 mg/daily for central nervous system (CNS), lymph-nodal, right adrenal gland, lung, and subcutaneous metastases. Best response was partial remission, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Time to treatment progression was 11 months. Main toxicities were grade 2 cutaneous vasculitis that required avapritinib discontinuation, and grade 2 uveitis of unknown origin, treated by vitrectomy and empiric antibiotic and antiviral therapy due to negative cultural tests. Uveitis was detected at the time of progression and therapy was definitively discontinued. In conclusion, avapritinib proved to be effective even in the presence of a pretreated disease, a high tumor burden, and brain metastases. In our experience, treatment was feasible and toxicity manageable. Considering the lack of effective therapies and the poor outcome of the disease, determination of c-KIT mutations should be performed routinely in cases of metastatic mucosal melanoma.

Indexed as

avapritinibKIT inhibitormucosal melanomatargeted therapyvulvar melanoma

Identifiers

PMID32821296
PMCPMC7406922
OpenAlexW3046651704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.