ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2020
Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Systemic Treatments of Small Intestinal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2025.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Dynamic monitoring of left atrial strain: a novel paradigm for early detection of cardiotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Reimagining Oncologic Drugs in Atherosclerosis: Emerging Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Enhancing treatment strategies for small bowel cancer: a clinical review of targeted therapy and immunotherapy approaches.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Case Report: Primary small bowel adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis responded well to a CapeOX + bevacizumab regimen.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Advanced Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Current Knowledge and Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Case report: A case of duodenal adenocarcinoma achieving significantly long survival treating with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy without positive biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Risk and Prognostic Factors for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study in China.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022Article
- Case Report: Molecular Features and Treatment Options for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line.
resultsThirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment-related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients.
conclusionsIn this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.