Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32820847›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Neural representational similarity between L1 and L2 in spoken and written language processing.

Say Young Kim, Lanfang Liu, Li Liu, Fan Cao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Say Young KimDepartment of English Language and Literature, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8021-4057
Lanfang LiuDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1448-9009
Li LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Fan CaoDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesGuangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science GD19CXL05Hanyang University HY-2018Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China, Key Area Research and Development Program 202007030011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial research on the brain mechanisms of L1 and L2 processing in bilinguals, it is still unknown whether language modality (i.e., visual vs. auditory) plays a role in determining whether L1 and L2 are processed similarly. Therefore, we examined the neural representational similarity in neural networks between L1 and L2 in spoken and written word processing in Korean-English-Chinese trilinguals. Participants performed both visual and auditory rhyming judgments in the three languages: Korean, English, and Chinese. The results showed greater similarity among the three languages in the auditory modality than in the visual modality, suggesting more differentiated networks for written word processing in the three languages than spoken word processing. In addition, there was less similarity between spoken and written word processing in L1 than the L2s, suggesting a more specialized network for each modality in L1 than L2s. Finally, the similarity between the two L2s (i.e., Chinese and English) was greater than that between each L2 and L1 after task performance was regressed out, especially in the visual modality, suggesting that L2s are processed similarly. These findings provide important insights about spoken and written language processing in the bilingual brain.

Indexed as

MultilingualismPsycholinguisticsReadingAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultbi/multilingualfMRIKoreanspoken word processingvisual word processing

Identifiers

PMID32820847
PMCPMC7643388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.