ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2020
Zooming in on protein-RNA interactions: a multi-level workflow to identify interaction partners.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- scRAPID-web: a web server for predicting protein-RNA interactions from single-cell transcriptomics.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Accessibility in proteins and RNAs interactions prediction with machine learning: are we overlooking non-experts?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Review
- RNA binding proteins (RBPs) on genetic stability and diseases.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Rationalizing the effects of RNA modifications on protein interactions.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
- Exosomal long non-coding RNA-LINC00839 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by activating NF-κB signaling pathway.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Prediction of protein-RNA interactions from single-cell transcriptomic data.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Preparation of Cardiac Extracts from Embryonal Hearts to Capture RNA-protein Interactions by CLIP.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- Exploring the landscape of tools and resources for the analysis of long non-coding RNAs.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Towards an IdealInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Roles of Emerging RNA-Binding Activity of cGAS in Innate Antiviral Response.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between proteins and RNA are at the base of numerous cellular regulatory and functional phenomena. The investigation of the biological relevance of non-coding RNAs has led to the identification of numerous novel RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, defining the RNA sequences and structures that are selectively recognised by an RBP remains challenging, since these interactions can be transient and highly dynamic, and may be mediated by unstructured regions in the protein, as in the case of many non-canonical RBPs. Numerous experimental and computational methodologies have been developed to predict, identify and verify the binding between a given RBP and potential RNA partners, but navigating across the vast ocean of data can be frustrating and misleading. In this mini-review, we propose a workflow for the identification of the RNA binding partners of putative, newly identified RBPs. The large pool of potential binders selected by in-cell experiments can be enriched by in silico tools such as catRAPID, which is able to predict the RNA sequences more likely to interact with specific RBP regions with high accuracy. The RNA candidates with the highest potential can then be analysed in vitro to determine the binding strength and to precisely identify the binding sites. The results thus obtained can furthermore validate the computational predictions, offering an all-round solution to the issue of finding the most likely RNA binding partners for a newly identified potential RBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.