Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32820638›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2020

Preoperative scar perception study comparing 'scarless' in the neck endoscopic thyroidectomy with open thyroidectomy: a cross-sectional study.

T Y Qiu, Jwl Lau, O Wong, H B Oh, T W Boon, R Parameswaran, K Y Ngiam

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Conversion rates in robotic thyroid surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. First Experience of Single-Port Robotic Areolar Approach Thyroidectomy.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T Y QiuYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jwl LauNational University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
O WongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
H B OhNg Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
T W BoonNational University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
R ParameswaranNational University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
K Y NgiamNational University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen thyroidectomy is the most common approach to thyroid surgery. However, 'scarless' (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy, consisting of endoscopic and robotic surgery, is progressively being adopted for its perceived cosmetic benefits. This study aims to determine the patient's preferred surgical approach and to identify the factors that influence their decision. MATERIALS AND

methodsA pilot study consisting of 100 patients with a surgical thyroid disorder were prospectively recruited from a single tertiary centre. An interviewer-administered survey was conducted. Demographic, socioeconomic status, scar perception and an adapted body image scale were evaluated to identify factors that shaped the patient's perception of the surgical approach.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 54.5 ± 13.0 years; 72% were women and 87% Chinese. Of the 100 patients, 75 patients considered scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy as their preferred surgical approach while 25 patients opted for open thyroid surgery. Improvement in scar perception score between scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroid surgery is associated with an increased willingness to choose scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy. The mean body image scale score was 6.9 ± 2.8, indicating no statistical difference between the surgical approaches. On multivariate analysis, improvement in scar perception score (odds ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval 1.11-10.29) and having surgeon recommendation (odds ratio 6.38, 95% confidence interval 1.80-22.63) were independently associated with interest in scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy.

conclusionPatients interest in undergoing scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy is driven by improved scar perception and surgeon's recommendation compared with open thyroid surgery.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCicatrixCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesThyroid DiseasesThyroidectomyOpen thyroidectomyPreoperativeScarless in the neck endoscopic thyroidectomyScar perceptionThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID32820638
PMCPMC7591632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.