ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2020
Agent-based modelling for SARS-CoV-2 epidemic prediction and intervention assessment: A methodological appraisal.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing human judgment forecasts in the rapid spread of the mpox outbreak: insights and challenges for pandemic preparedness.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk analysis and assessment method for infectious diseases based on information entropy theory.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Metapopulation dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a small-scale Amazonian society.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- The race to understand immunopathology in COVID-19: Perspectives on the impact of quantitative approaches to understand within-host interactions.Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness.PLOS digital health · 2022Review
- Predicting and preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in indoor environments: an agent-based modeling study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The effects of local homogeneity assumptions in metapopulation models of infectious disease.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Prediction and prevention of pandemics via graphical model inference and convex programming.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Mathematical modeling and estimation for next wave of COVID-19 in Poland.Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal · 2022Article
- Emergence of universality in the transmission dynamics of COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Descriptive understanding and prediction in COVID-19 modelling.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2021Article
- Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal for philosophy of science · 2021Article
- To Freeze or Not to Freeze? Epidemic Prevention and Control in the DSGE Model Using an Agent-Based Epidemic Component.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Agent-based modelling for SARS-CoV-2 epidemic prediction and intervention assessment: A methodological appraisal.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOur purpose is to assess epidemiological agent-based models-or ABMs-of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic methodologically. The rapid spread of the outbreak requires fast-paced decision-making regarding mitigation measures. However, the evidence for the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as imposed social distancing and school or workplace closures is scarce: few observational studies use quasi-experimental research designs, and conducting randomized controlled trials seems infeasible. Additionally, evidence from the previous coronavirus outbreaks of SARS and MERS lacks external validity, given the significant differences in contagiousness of those pathogens relative to SARS-CoV-2. To address the pressing policy questions that have emerged as a result of COVID-19, epidemiologists have produced numerous models that range from simple compartmental models to highly advanced agent-based models. These models have been criticized for involving simplifications and lacking empirical support for their assumptions.
methodsTo address these voices and methodologically appraise epidemiological ABMs, we consider AceMod (the model of the COVID-19 epidemic in Australia) as a case study of the modelling practice.
resultsOur example shows that, although epidemiological ABMs involve simplifications of various sorts, the key characteristics of social interactions and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 are represented sufficiently accurately. This is the case because these modellers treat empirical results as inputs for constructing modelling assumptions and rules that the agents follow; and they use calibration to assert the adequacy to benchmark variables.
conclusionsGiven this, we claim that the best epidemiological ABMs are models of actual mechanisms and deliver both mechanistic and difference-making evidence. Consequently, they may also adequately describe the effects of possible interventions. Finally, we discuss the limitations of ABMs and put forward policy recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.