SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The efficacy of acupuncture and related treatments on chronic pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Sexually transmitted infections · 2019Pooled it
- The Effect of Laser Biostimulation at Sensitized Acupoints on Chronic Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life in Women with Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Trial
- Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Review
- Antibiotic Exposure and Early Reproductive Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in a Chinese Couple-Based Preconception Cohort.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Association Between Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Mediating Role of Anti- and Pro-Inflammatory Dietary Patterns.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Global and Regional Impact of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Females Across All Age Groups (1990-2021) with Projections to 2046: Findings from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Gut-reproduction axis: a new perspective on understanding pelvic inflammatory disease.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Metabolic reprogramming, macrophage polarization, and intercellular crosstalk in pelvic inflammatory disease: emerging paradigms and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Electroacupuncture of Guanyuan (CV4) Acupoint Improved Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pain by Inhibiting Neuroinflammation and Sympathetic Activity.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Cross-Sectional Imaging of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls on CT and MR.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Research progress on the interaction between intestinal flora and microRNA in pelvic inflammatory diseases.Non-coding RNA research · 2025Review
- Article
- Case Report: Immediate vs. delayed azithromycin for chronic endometritis: a retrospective cohort study on cure rates and pregnancy outcomes.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Modified Hongteng Baijiang decoction enema improves sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease by regulating the LIF/JAK2/STAT3 pathway and gut microbiota.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.Human reproduction update · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic inflammatory disease (PID) affects 4% to 12% of women of reproductive age. The main intervention for acute PID is broad-spectrum antibiotics administered intravenously, intramuscularly or orally. We assessed the optimal treatment regimen for PID.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens to treat PID. SEARCH
methodsIn January 2020, we searched the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Infections Review Group's Specialized Register, which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1944 to 2020, located through hand and electronic searching; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; four other databases; and abstracts in selected publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing antibiotics with placebo or other antibiotics for the treatment of PID in women of reproductive age, either as inpatient or outpatient treatment. We limited our review to a comparison of drugs in current use that are recommended by the 2015 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for treatment of PID. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and conducted GRADE assessments of the quality of evidence. MAIN
resultsWe included 39 RCTs (6894 women) in this review, adding two new RCTs at this update. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to high, the main limitations being serious risk of bias (due to poor reporting of study methods and lack of blinding), serious inconsistency, and serious imprecision. None of the studies reported quinolones and cephalosporins, or the outcomes laparoscopic evidence of resolution of PID based on physician opinion or fertility outcomes. Length of stay results were insufficiently reported for analysis. Regimens containing azithromycin versus regimens containing doxycycline We are uncertain whether there was a clinically relevant difference between azithromycin and doxycycline in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.55; 2 RCTs, 243 women; I AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe are uncertain whether one treatment was safer or more effective than any other for the cure of mild-moderate or severe PID Based on a single study at a low risk of bias, a macrolide (azithromycin) probably improves the rates of cure of mild-moderate PID, compared to tetracycline (doxycycline).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.