Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32820453›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of integrative medicine2021

Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer after Chemotherapy Failure: Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Teng-Teng Hao, Yun Xu, Ning Cui, Qian Qu, Bi-Yan Liang, Ju-Hua Yuan, Yang Zhao, Qing-Na Li, Fang Lu, Yu Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02923622 (Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02923622 unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorXiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesRan2016Enrolled384ConditionsAdvanced Colorectal Cancer, Traditional Chinese MedicineArmsTraditional Chinese medicine herbals, Integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine, Western medicine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Teng-Teng HaoDepartment of Oncology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Yun XuDepartment of Oncology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Ning CuiDepartment of Oncology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Qian QuDepartment of Oncology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Bi-Yan LiangChinese Mdeicine Center for AIDS Prevention and Treatment, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Ju-Hua YuanDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, 100039, China.
Yang ZhaoInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Qing-Na LiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Fang LuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Yu WuDepartment of Oncology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China. wy713@vip.sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths and has the third highest incidence in the world. Almost half of the patients with CRC have metastases at the time of diagnosis. However, the treatment for patients with metastatic CRC that progresses after approved conventional chemotherapy is still controversial. Chinese medicine (CM) has unique characteristics and advantages in treating metastatic CRC.

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of CM in patients with metastatic CRC after failure of conventional chemotherapy.

methodsThe study is a multicenter prospective cohort study. A total of 384 patients with documented metastatic CRC after failure of conventional chemotherapy will be included from 9 hospitals among Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, and Guizhou, and assigned to three groups according to paitents' wishes: (1) integrated Chinese and Western medicine (ICM) group receiving CM herbal treatment combined with Western medicine (WM) anti-tumor therapy, (2) Chinese medicine (CM) group receiving only CM herbal treatment, and (3) WM group receiving only WM anti-tumor therapy. The primary endpoint is the overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include the progression free survival (PFS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, tumor control, and CM symptom score. DISCUSSION: This prospective study will assess the effectiveness and safety of CM in treating metastatic CRC after conventional chemotherapy failure. Patients in the ICM group will be compared with those in the WM group and CM group. If certified to be effective, national provision of CM treatment in metastatic CRC will probably be advised. (Registration No. NCT02923622 on ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMedicine, Chinese TraditionalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChinaHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment FailureChinese medicinecolorectal cancercomplementary therapyconventional chemotherapyeffectiveness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.