ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020
Physicochemical and biological controls of sulfide accumulation in a high temperature oil reservoir.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nitrate and oxygen significantly changed the abundance rather than structure of sulphate-reducing and sulphur-oxidising bacteria in water retrieved from petroleum reservoirs.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In order to maintain the reservoir pressure during secondary oil production large volumes of seawater are injected into reservoirs. This practice introduces high concentrations of sulfate into the reservoir promoting the growth of sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) and results in the production of an increasing volume of produced water (PW) that needs to be discharged. SRM reduce sulfate to sulfide causing reservoir souring and as a mitigation strategy nitrate is injecting along with the seawater into the reservoir. We used PW from the Halfdan oil field (North Sea) to set up microcosms to determine the best reinjection strategy in order to inhibit SRM activity and minimize the environmental impact of PW during secondary oil production. We discuss the effect of temperature, electron donor, and sulfate and nitrate availability on sulfide production and microbial community composition. Temperature and the terminal electron acceptor played a key role in shaping the microbial community of the microcosms. PW reinjection at 62 °C inhibited SRM activity due to nitrite toxicity by encouraging nitrate reduction to nitrite by thermophilic nitrate reducers, while at 74 °C we observed complete absence of any microbial activity over the course of 150 days. KEY POINTS: • Temperature and the presence/ absence of nitrate shaped the microbial community structure. • Thermophilic nitrate reducers convert nitrate to ammonia with the accumulation of nitrite that inhibits sulfide production. • Nitrite inhibition is the most effective nitrate-based souring mitigation mechanisms. • The reinjection of hot produced water to oil reservoirs is a promising souring mitigation approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.