ArticleJournal of medical ethics2020
Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control.
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Italian policy of mandating SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for healthcare workers: Analysis of the policy processes and preliminary outcomes.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Vaccination in those with mental health difficulties: A guide to assist decision-making in England, Scotland, and Wales.Medicine, science, and the law · 2022Article
- Solidarity in Pandemics, Mandatory Vaccination, and Public Health Ethics.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination and the European Court of Human Rights.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- Is Mandatory Vaccination for COVID-19 Constitutional under Brazilian Law?Health and human rights · 2021Article
- COVID-19 vaccination for people with severe mental illness: why, what, and how?The lancet. Psychiatry · 2021Review
- Focusing COVID-19 vaccinations on elderly and high-risk people.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Would compulsory treatment or vaccination for COVID-19 be justified? In England, there would be significant legal barriers to it. However, we offer a conditional ethical argument in favour of allowing compulsory treatment and vaccination, drawing on an ethical comparison with external constraints-such as quarantine, isolation and 'lockdown'-that have already been authorised to control the pandemic in this jurisdiction. We argue that,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.