Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819960›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention in primary care: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness (SupportBack 2).

Adam W A Geraghty, Lisa Roberts, Jonathan Hill, Nadine E Foster, Lucy Yardley, Elaine Hay, Beth Stuart, David Turner, Gareth Griffiths, Frances Webley and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK A.W.Geraghty@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8351
Lisa RobertsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Jonathan HillPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Nadine E FosterPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Elaine HayPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Beth StuartPrimary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
David TurnerKeele Clinical Trials Unit, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Frances WebleySchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Lorraine DurcanSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Alannah MorganSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Stephanie HughesPrimary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Sarah BathersKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Stephanie Butler-WalleyKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Simon WathallKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Gemma MansellSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-2678
Linda LeighPatient and Public Involvement Representative, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Aston University · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBKeele University · GBArthritis UK · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health 16/111/78
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-management and remaining physically active are first-line recommendations for the care of patients with low back pain (LBP). With a lifetime prevalence of up to 85%, novel approaches to support behavioural self-management are needed. Internet interventions may provide accessible support for self-management of LBP in primary care. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the 'SupportBack' internet intervention, with or without physiotherapist telephone support in reducing LBP-related disability in primary care patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-parallel arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial will compare three arms: (1) usual primary care for LBP; (2) usual primary care for LBP and an internet intervention; (3) usual primary care for LBP and an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone support. Patients with current LBP and no indicators of serious spinal pathology are identified and invited via general practice list searches and mailouts or opportunistic recruitment following LBP consultations. Participants undergo a secondary screen for possible serious spinal pathology and are then asked to complete baseline measures online after which they are randomised to an intervention arm. Follow-ups occur at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is physical function (using the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire) over 12 months (repeated measures design). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, troublesome days in pain over the last month, pain self-efficacy, catastrophising, kinesophobia, health-related quality of life and cost-related measures for a full health economic analysis. A full mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (REC Ref: 18/SC/0388). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, communication with practices and patient groups. Patient representatives will support the implementation of our full dissemination strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14736486.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionLow Back PainSelf-ManagementCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInternetMulticenter Studies as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState Medicineback painprimary carerehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID32819960
PMCPMC7440707
OpenAlexW3034571604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.