Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819958›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Intervention elements to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity receiving outpatient care: a scoping review.

Jia Qi Lee, Kate Ying, Penny Lun, Keng Teng Tan, Wendy Ang, Yasmin Munro, Yew Yoong Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Appropriate Prescribing for older adults with Multimorbidity (Pro-M): protocol for a feasibility study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jia Qi LeeGeriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore jiaqi.lee@u.duke.nus.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5260-0102
Kate YingGeriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.
Penny LunGeriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.
Keng Teng TanDepartment of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Wendy AngDepartment of Pharmacy, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Yasmin MunroMedical Library, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore.
Yew Yoong DingGeriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.
Geriatric Education and Research Institute · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGChangi General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePolypharmacy occurs in approximately 30% of older adults aged 65 years or more, particularly among those with multimorbidity. With polypharmacy, there is an associated risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). The aims of this scoping review were to (1) identify the intervention elements that have been adopted to reduce PIP in the outpatient setting and (2) determine the behaviour change wheel (BCW) intervention functions performed by each of the identified intervention elements.

designScoping review DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, grey literature sources, six key geriatrics journals and the reference lists of review papers. STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting an intervention or strategy that addressed PIP in the older adult population (age ≥65) with multimorbidity in the outpatient setting and in which the primary prescriber is the physician. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted from the included studies can be broadly categorised into (1) publication details, (2) intervention details and (3) results. This was followed by data synthesis and analysis based on the BCW framework.

resultsOf 8195 studies yielded, 80 studies were included in the final analysis and 14 intervention elements were identified. An average of two to three elements were adopted in each intervention. The three most frequently adopted intervention elements were medication review (70%), training (26.3%) and tool/instrument(s) (22.5%). Among medication reviews, 70% involved pharmacists. The 14 intervention elements were mapped onto five intervention functions: 'education', 'persuasion', 'training', 'environmental restructuring' and 'enablement'.

conclusionPIP is a multifaceted problem that involves multiple stakeholders. As such, interventions that address PIP require multiple elements to target the behaviour of the various stakeholders. The intervention elements and their corresponding functions identified in this scoping review will serve to inform the design of complex interventions that aim to reduce PIP.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingMultimorbidityAgedAmbulatory CareHumansPharmacistsPolypharmacygeriatric medicineprimary carequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32819958
PMCPMC7440708
OpenAlexW3071923444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.