ArticleBMJ open2020
What do children, parents and staff think about a healthy lifestyles intervention delivered in primary schools? a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adolescents' eating habits: perspectives of students, parents, and staff in schools: a qualitative study from Rawalpindi, Pakistan.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Caregivers' views on childcare staff's role in promoting children's oral health.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Identifying barriers and facilitators to increase fibre intakes in UK primary school children and exploring the acceptability of intervention components: a UK qualitative study.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Educators' experiences and perspectives of child weight discussions with parents in primary school settings.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of sustainable school meals: a qualitative study of the OPTIMAT™-intervention.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary schools are crucial settings for early weight management interventions but effects on children's weight are small and evidence shows that deficiencies in intervention implementation may be responsible. Very little is known about the roles of multiple stakeholders in the process of implementation. We used a multiple-stakeholder qualitative research approach to explore the implementation of an intervention developed to improve the diet and increase the levels of physical activity for children living in some of the most deprived areas of England.
designFor this qualitative study, interviews and focus groups were carried out using semi-structured topic guides. Data were analysed thematically.
settingSeven primary schools (pupils aged 4 to 11) in Manchester, England.
participantsWe conducted 14 focus groups with children aged 5 to 10 years and interviews with 19 staff members and 17 parents.
interventionManchester Healthy Schools (MHS) is a multicomponent intervention, developed to improve diet and physical activity in schools with the aim of reducing and preventing childhood obesity.
resultsThree themes were developed from the data:
conclusionAll participant groups had a common conceptualisation of health as having physical and psychological components and that action could be taken in childhood to change behaviours that protect long-term health. When parents and staff felt a shared sense of responsibility for children's health and levels of congruence between home and school norms around diet and physical activity were high, parents and children were more likely to accept the policies implemented as part of MHS. Effective two-way communication between home and school is therefore vital for successful implementation of this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.