Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819901›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Lack of Baseline Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Enhancement Predicts Future Stability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

A S Larson, V T Lehman, G Lanzino, W Brinjikji

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A S LarsonFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.S.L., V.T.L., G.L., W.B.) Brinjikji.Waleed@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6021-3452
V T LehmanFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.S.L., V.T.L., G.L., W.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-8713-8293
G LanzinoFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.S.L., V.T.L., G.L., W.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-1479-465X
W BrinjikjiFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.S.L., V.T.L., G.L., W.B.) Brinjikji.Waleed@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-5524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe utility of vessel wall MR imaging in identifying unstable intracranial aneurysms has been suggested but remains controversial. PURPOSE: Our aim was to provide further insight into the potential relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement on initial vessel wall imaging and aneurysm instability at follow-up. DATA SOURCES: Our sources were PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. STUDY SELECTION: We searched for English language studies that reported the presence of vessel wall enhancement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on baseline vessel wall imaging studies with longitudinal follow-up of aneurysm status. DATA ANALYSIS: Aneurysms were grouped into "stable" and "unstable" groups at follow-up on the basis of growth, symptomatic manifestation, or rupture. The association of each group with aneurysm wall enhancement on initial vessel wall imaging was determined. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three studies constituting 407 aneurysms were included. Aneurysms with wall enhancement were at higher risk of being unstable at follow-up (risk ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.5). The sensitivity of aneurysm wall enhancement on vessel wall imaging was 74.3% (95% CI, 56.7%-87.5%), specificity was 58.3% (95% CI, 53.1%-63.4%), positive predictive value was 14.4% (95% CI, 11.8%-17.4%), negative predictive value was 96.0% (95% CI, 93.2%-97.7%), and the overall accuracy of the test was 59.7% (95% CI, 54.8%-64.5%). LIMITATIONS: Only 3 studies were identified for inclusion in this analysis. More longitudinal studies of vessel wall imaging and aneurysm progression are needed.

conclusionsThe lack of wall enhancement may be a predictor of aneurysm stability. The utility of vessel wall imaging in detecting unstable aneurysms requires more data.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32819901
PMCPMC7583099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.