Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819712›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology2020

Radiation oncology in times of COVID-2019: A review article for those in the eye of the storm - An Indian perspective.

Ritika Harjani Hinduja, Karishma George, Mansi Barthwal, Vibhay Pareek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ritika Harjani HindujaAssociate Consultant, Department of Radiation Oncology, P.D Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: ritikaharjani@gmail.com.
Karishma GeorgeJunior Consultant, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivekanand Cancer Hospital and Optimus Oncology Centre, Latur, India. Electronic address: george.karishma@gmail.com.
Mansi BarthwalSenior Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: mansibarthwal@gmail.com.
Vibhay PareekSenior Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: vibhay@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global COVID-2019 pandemic has presented to the field of radiation oncology a management dilemma in providing evidence-based treatments to all cancer patients. There is a need for appropriate measures to be taken to reduce infectious spread between the medical healthcare providers and the patient population. Such times warrant resource prioritization and to continue treatment with best available evidence, thereby reducing the risk of COVID-2019 transmission in times where the workforce is reduced. There has been literature presented in different aspects related to providing safety measures, running of a radiation department and for the management of various cancer subsites. In this article, we present a comprehensive review for sustaining a radiation oncology department in times of the COVID-2019 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIndiaPandemicsRadiation OncologySARS-CoV-2COVID-2019Evidence-based oncologyPandemicRadiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID32819712
PMCPMC7357513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.