Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819452›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

'I had never seen so many lobbyists': food industry political practices during the development of a new nutrition front-of-pack labelling system in Colombia.

Melissa Mialon, Diego Alejandro Gaitan Charry, Gustavo Cediel, Eric Crosbie, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi, Eliana Maria Perez Tamayo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacological insights intoFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Commercial Determinants of Latinx Health: A Scoping Review of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in the USA.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Do ESG Frameworks Capture Corporate Health Impacts? An Analysis of the Food and Beverage Industry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa MialonSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9883-6441
Diego Alejandro Gaitan CharrySchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Gustavo CedielSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-2408
Eric CrosbieSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.
Fernanda Baeza ScagliusiSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eliana Maria Perez TamayoSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify and monitor food industry use of political practices during the adoption of nutrition warning labels (WL) in Colombia.

designDocument analysis of publicly available information triangulated with interviews.

settingColombia.

participantsEighteen key informants from the government (n 2), academia (n 1), civil society (n 12), the media (n 2) and a former food industry employee (n 1).

resultsIn Colombia, the food industry used experts and groups funded by large transnationals to promote its preferred front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPL) and discredit the proposed warning models. The industry criticised the proposed WL, discussing the negative impacts they would have on trade, the excessive costs required to implement them and the fact that consumers were responsible for making the right choices about what to eat. Food industry actors also interacted with the government and former members of large trade associations now in decision-making positions in the public sector. The Codex Alimentarius was also a platform through which the industry got access to decision-making and could influence the FOPL policy.

conclusionsIn Colombia, the food industry used a broad range of political strategies that could have negatively influenced the FOPL policy process. Despite this influence, the mandatory use of WL was announced in February 2020. There is an urgent need to condemn such political practices as they still could prevent the implementation of other internationally recommended measures to improve population health in the country and abroad, nutrition WL being only of them.

Indexed as

Food IndustryFood LabelingColombiaFood-Processing IndustryHumansNutrition PolicyOrganizationsCorporate determinants of healthCorporate political activityFood industryFront-of-pack nutrition labelling

Identifiers

PMID32819452
PMCPMC10195544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.