ArticleBMC medical ethics2020
Disclosure of medical errors: physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in an oncology center.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical challenges in medical error disclosure among healthcare professionals in teaching hospitals: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Ethical Issues of Risk Management Disclosure in Healthcare Networks.Healthcare management forum · 2026Article
- Assessment of bioethics education, ethical awareness, and training needs among physicians in Jordan.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2026Article
- Observational
- Nurses' experiences of reporting the medical errors of their colleagues: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Psychometric Properties of Chinese Version of the Barriers to Error Disclosure Assessment (C-BEDA) Tool.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Barriers to reporting medical errors from the perspective of obstetric residents: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Experience of obstetricians and gynecologists in the management of medicolegal cases in Egypt.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Disclosing Adverse Events in Healthcare: Understanding the Gap Between Knowledge and Practice in Developing Countries.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2022Article
- Perception of the Disclosure of Adverse Events in a Latin American Culture: A National Survey.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2022Article
- Health System- and Patient-Related Factors Associated with COVID-19 Mortality among Hospitalized Patients in Limpopo Province of South Africa's Public Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of forensic practitioners during COVID-19 pandemic in Arab countries.Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetween the need for transparency in healthcare, widely promoted by patient's safety campaigns, and the fear of negative consequences and malpractice threats, physicians face challenging decisions on whether or not disclosing medical errors to patients and families is a valid option. We aim to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of physicians in our center regarding medical error disclosure.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional self-administered questionnaire study. The questionnaire was piloted and no major modifications were made. A day-long training workshop consisting of didactic lectures, short and long case scenarios with role playing and feedback from the instructors, were conducted. Physicians who attended these training workshops were invited to complete the questionnaire at the end of the training, and physicians who did not attend any training were sent a copy of the questionnaire to their offices to complete. To assure anonymity and transparency of responses, we did not query names or departments. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographics and KAP. The differences between response\s of physicians who received the training and those who did not were analyzed with t-test and descriptive statistics. The 0.05 level of significance was used as a cutoff measure for statistical significance.
resultsEighty-eight physicians completed the questionnaire (55 attended training (62.50%), and 33 did not (37.50%)). Sixty Five percent of physicians were males and the mean number of years of experience was 16.5 years. Eighty-Seven percent (n = 73) of physicians were more likely to report major harm, compared to minor harm or no harm. Physicians who attended the workshop were more knowledgeable of articles of Jordan's Law on Medical and Health Liability (66.7% vs 45.5%, p-value = 0.017) and the Law was more likely to affect their decision on error disclosure (61.8% vs 36.4%, p-value = 0.024).
conclusionFormal training workshops on disclosing medical errors have the power to positively influence physicians' KAP toward disclosing medical errors to patients and possibly promoting a culture of transparency in the health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.