Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819346›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Exploiting mutual information for the imputation of static and dynamic mixed-type clinical data with an adaptive k-nearest neighbours approach.

Erica Tavazzi, Sebastian Daberdaku, Rosario Vasta, Andrea Calvo, Adriano Chiò, Barbara Di Camillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Different Data Mining Approaches Based Medical Text Data.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erica TavazziDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Via Gradenigo 6/A, Padua, 35131, Italy.
Sebastian DaberdakuDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Via Gradenigo 6/A, Padua, 35131, Italy.
Rosario VastaDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, Turin, 10124, Italy.
Andrea CalvoDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, Turin, 10124, Italy.
Adriano ChiòDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, Turin, 10124, Italy.
Barbara Di CamilloDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Via Gradenigo 6/A, Padua, 35131, Italy. barbara.dicamillo@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8415-4688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical registers constitute an invaluable resource in the medical data-driven decision making context. Accurate machine learning and data mining approaches on these data can lead to faster diagnosis, definition of tailored interventions, and improved outcome prediction. A typical issue when implementing such approaches is the almost unavoidable presence of missing values in the collected data. In this work, we propose an imputation algorithm based on a mutual information-weighted k-nearest neighbours approach, able to handle the simultaneous presence of missing information in different types of variables. We developed and validated the method on a clinical register, constituted by the information collected over subsequent screening visits of a cohort of patients affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

methodsFor each subject with missing data to be imputed, we create a feature vector constituted by the information collected over his/her first three months of visits. This vector is used as sample in a k-nearest neighbours procedure, in order to select, among the other patients, the ones with the most similar temporal evolution of the disease over time. An ad hoc similarity metric was implemented for the sample comparison, capable of handling the different nature of the data, the presence of multiple missing values and include the cross-information among features captured by the mutual information statistic.

resultsWe validated the proposed imputation method on an independent test set, comparing its performance with those of three state-of-the-art competitors, resulting in better performance. We further assessed the validity of our algorithm by comparing the performance of a survival classifier built on the data imputed with our method versus the one built on the data imputed with the best-performing competitor.

conclusionsImputation of missing data is a crucial -and often mandatory- step when working with real-world datasets. The algorithm proposed in this work could effectively impute an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical dataset, by handling the temporal and the mixed-type nature of the data and by exploiting the cross-information among features. We also showed how the imputation quality can affect a machine learning task.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsData MiningDatasets as TopicAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBayes TheoremComputational BiologyDiseaseHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisClinical datasetsImputationK-nearest neighboursMissing dataMutual informationNaïve Bayes

Identifiers

PMID32819346
PMCPMC7439551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.