Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819339›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Blessings or burdens: an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) study on the motivations and their impact on end-of-life caregiving among Asian family caregivers.

Geraldine Tan-Ho, Ping Ying Choo, Paul Victor Patinadan, Casuarine Xinyi Low, Andy Hau Yan Ho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geraldine Tan-HoPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9888-8922
Ping Ying ChooPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-1268
Paul Victor PatinadanPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-6673
Casuarine Xinyi LowPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-0118
Andy Hau Yan HoPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. andyhyho@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-7043
Nanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Ministry of Education SG MOE2016-T2-1-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the impact of family caregiving has been well-documented, many of such studies center on investigating external factors such as socioeconomic status, accessibility to resources and availability of social support as the primary causation of caregiver wellbeing outcomes. This paper explores the motivations that drive family caregivers in supporting their family members at the end-of-life, and critically examines how internal appraisal processes of such motivations can both positively and negatively impact their wellbeing.

methodsThis study adopted an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to investigate the motivations and internal appraisal processes of Asian family caregivers in Singapore who were tending to a dying family member. Qualitative dyadic interview data (N = 20) was drawn from a larger Randomized Controlled Trial for a novel Family Dignity Intervention (FDI) for palliative care patients and their families. The sampling population consisted of participants aged 21 and above who were identified to be the primary caregivers of older palliative care patients with a prognosis of less than 12 months. Data collection was conducted in the homes of patients and family caregivers.

resultsFindings revealed six themes that could either nurture or diminish caregiver wellbeing: 1) Honoring Fidelity (caregivers were motivated to commit to their caregiving roles in order to avoid regret), 2) Alleviating Suffering (caregivers were motivated to relieve their family member's pain), 3) Enduring Attachment (caregivers were motivated to spend time together with their family member), 4) Preserving Gratitude (caregivers were motivated to express their appreciation to their family member by caregiving), 5) Navigating Change (caregivers were motivated to adapt accordingly to changes in the illness trajectory) and 6) Reconciling with Mortality (caregivers were motivated to respond accordingly to their family member's prognosis). The final theme of the Wellbeing Determinant is posited as an indication of self-determination, and is conjectured to influence how caregiving motivations are appraised by the caregiver.

conclusionFulfilling and enhancing one's sense of self-determination appears central to infusing one's caregiving motivations with positive meaning, and consequently nurturing one's wellbeing in the end-of-life caregiving journey. These findings are discussed with recommendations for healthcare professionals working with family caregivers of palliative care patients.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAgedAsian PeopleCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSingaporeSocial SupportTerminal CareBurnoutCaregiverEnd-of-lifeMeaningMotivationsPalliative careQualitative researchResilienceSelf-determinationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID32819339
PMCPMC7441659
OpenAlexW3050801319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.