ArticleBMC oral health2020
Examination of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability during retentive force measurement of different clasps using the developed small-sized retentive force measurement device.
Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Evaluation of Robotic and Manual Bending of Clasps for Removable Partial Dentures.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe design process of a removable partial denture (RPD) consists of rests, major connectors, minor connectors, denture base, and retainer. The abutment tooth contour determines the location of the retention portion of the clasp at the retention areas. The load capacity of the clasp depends on various factors such as type, the position of a clasp, tooth position, clasp length, and pullout location. As a general rule, the amount of retention required to dislodge the RPD from the supporting structure should always be the minimum necessary to resist reasonable dislodging forces. Excessive force from the clasps may cause many problems. Although there are many reports on the retentive force of cast clasps using large devices, it has not been possible to measure it using simple devices until now.
methodThe purpose of the present study is to develop a small-sized retentive force measurement device that can easily measure the retentive force of a clasp used for an RPD. It is to examine inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. A small-sized retentive force measurement device that can be easily measured in the laboratory has been developed. Using commercially available hard plaster cast, a skilled dental technician has made 10 types of cast clasps used in clinical practice using conventional techniques. Three assessors measured the retentive force of 10 types of cast clasps. To confirm the reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficients ICC (1,1) and ICC (1,3) of the 3 assessors were calculated, and the reliability within the assessor was examined. The inter-class correlation coefficients ICC (3,1) and ICC (3,3) were calculated, and the reliability of the assessors was examined.
resultThe intra-class correlation coefficients of 3 assessors are as follows: assessor 1 has ICC (1,1) = 0.971, ICC (1,3) = 0.990, assessor 2 has ICC (1,1) = 0.967, ICC (1,3) = 0.989, assessor 3 has ICC (1,1) = 0.962, ICC (1,3) = 0.987. The inter-class correlation coefficients of 3 assessors are as follows: ICC (3,1) = 0.993, ICC (3,3) = 0.998. From the evaluation standard of the intraclass correlation coefficients of reliability value by ICC, it was evaluated as almost perfect and high reproducibility was confirmed.
conclusionThe developed small-sized retentive force measurement device has reproducibility within and between the assessors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.