Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819280›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Diagnosis-linked antibiotic prescribing in Swedish primary care - a comparison between in-hours and out-of-hours.

Olof Cronberg, Mia Tyrstrup, Kim Ekblom, Katarina Hedin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olof CronbergVäxjöhälsan Primary Healthcare Center, VC Växjöhälsan, Hjortvägen 1, 352 45, Växjö, Sweden. olof.cronberg@med.lu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-8255
Mia TyrstrupDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7245-3509
Kim EkblomDepartment of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-1310
Katarina HedinDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1931-2752

Funding

Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS) FORSS-750591R&D Kronoberg, Region Kronoberg 897741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise in antibiotic resistance is a global public health concern, and antibiotic overuse needs to be reduced. Earlier studies of out-of-hours care have indicated that antibiotic prescribing is less appropriate than that of in-hours care. However, no study has compared the out-of-hours treatment of infections to in-hours treatment within the same population.

methodsThis retrospective, descriptive study was based on data retrieved from the Kronoberg Infection Database in Primary Care (KIDPC), which consists of all visits to primary care with an infection diagnosis or prescription of antibiotics during 2006-2014. The purpose was to study the trends in antibiotic prescribing and to compare consultations and prescriptions between in-hours and out-of-hours.

resultsThe visit rate for all infections was 434 visits per 1000 inhabitants per year. The visit rate was stable during the study period, but the antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 266 prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants in 2006 to 194 prescriptions in 2014 (mean annual change - 8.5 [95% CI - 11.9 to - 5.2]). For the out-of-hours visits (12% of the total visits), a similar reduction in antibiotic prescribing was seen. The decrease was most apparent among children and in respiratory tract infections. When antibiotic prescribing during out-of-hours was compared to in-hours, the unadjusted relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.37 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.38), but when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis, the relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.10). The reduction after adjustment was largely explained by a higher visit rate during out-of-hours for infections requiring antibiotics (acute otitis media, pharyngotonsillitis, and lower urinary tract infection). The choices of antibiotics used for common diagnoses were similar.

conclusionsAlthough the infection visit rate was unchanged over the study period, there was a significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing, especially to children and for respiratory tract infections. The higher antibiotic prescribing rate during out-of-hours was small when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis. No excess prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was seen. Therefore, interventions selectively aiming at out-of-hours centres seem to be unmotivated in a low-prescribing context.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansInfantInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescribingDiagnosis-linked prescriptionElectronic health recordsInfectious diseaseIn-hoursOut-of-hours servicePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID32819280
PMCPMC7441551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.