Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32819278›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Candidate stress biomarkers for queen failure diagnostics.

Alison McAfee, Joseph Milone, Abigail Chapman, Leonard J Foster, Jeffery S Pettis, David R Tarpy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Long Non-Coding RNA LOC113219358 Regulates Immune Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bleomycin reducesMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Paromomycin ReducesMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison McAfeeDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. alison.n.mcafee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6649
Joseph MiloneDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Abigail ChapmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Leonard J FosterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeffery S PettisPettis and Associates LLC, Salisbury, MD, USA.
David R TarpyDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CASalisbury University · US

Funding

Genome British Columbia 214PROGenome Canada 214PRONational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2016-07962Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 311654-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQueen failure is a persistent problem in beekeeping operations, but in the absence of overt symptoms it is often difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the root cause. Stressors like heat-shock, cold-shock, and sublethal pesticide exposure can reduce stored sperm viability and lead to cryptic queen failure. Previously, we suggested candidate protein markers indicating heat-shock in queens. Here, we further investigate these heat-shock markers and test new stressors to identify additional candidate protein markers.

resultsWe found that heat-shocking queens for upwards of 1 h at 40 °C was necessary to induce significant changes in the two strongest candidate heat-shock markers, and that relative humidity significantly influenced the degree of activation. In blind heat-shock experiments, we tested the efficiency of these markers at assigning queens to their respective treatment groups and found that one marker was sufficient to correctly assign queens 75% of the time. Finally, we compared cold-shocked queens at 4 °C and pesticide-exposed queens to controls to identify candidate markers for these additional stressors, and compared relative abundances of all markers to queens designated as 'healthy' and 'failing' by beekeepers. Queens that failed in the field had higher expression of both heat-shock and pesticide protein markers, but not cold-shock markers.

conclusionsThis work offers some of the first steps towards developing molecular diagnostic tools to aid in determining cryptic causes of queen failure. Further work will be necessary to determine how long after the stress event a marker's expression remains elevated, and how accurate these markers will be for field diagnoses.

Indexed as

PesticidesBeesBiomarkersBiomarkersPesticidesBiomarkersHoney beesProteomicsQueensSpermathecaSperm viabilityStressors

Identifiers

PMID32819278
PMCPMC7441638
OpenAlexW3080378244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.