Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818794›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2021

Relating value-driven attention to psychopathology.

Brian A Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Mouse-Tracking Paradigm for Value-Driven Attentional Capture.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Implementations of sign- and goal-tracking behavior in humans: A scoping review.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Decoding and modifying dynamic attentional bias in gaming disorder.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Rethinking Distraction.Visual cognition · 2024
    Article
  19. An adaptive view of attentional control.The American psychologist · 2021
    Review
  20. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brian A AndersonTexas A&M University, Department of Psychology, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, Unites States. Electronic address: brian.anderson@tamu.edu.

Funding

The Control of Attention and Learning from Physical EffortR01DA046410 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, BRIAN AUGUST · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward-associated objects receive preferential attention, reflecting a bias in information processing that develops automatically following associative learning. Mounting evidence suggests that such value-driven attention operates abnormally in certain psychopathologies, with attentional biases for reward-associated objects being either exaggerated or blunted compared to healthy controls. Here, I review the evidence linking value-driven attention to psychopathology, including drug addiction, depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), compulsivity, and impulsive and risky decision-making. I conclude by offering an integrative framework for conceptualizing the link between value-driven attention and psychopathology, along with suggestions for future research into this burgeoning area of investigation, including research on object attachment.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityHumansImpulsive BehaviorPsychopathologyReward

Identifiers

PMID32818794
PMCPMC7854796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.