Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818205›Full record

ArticleThe ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments2020

Mapping Motor Cortex Stimulation to Muscle Responses: A Deep Neural Network Modeling Approach.

Navid Akbar, Mathew Yarossi, Marc Martinez-Gost, Marc A Sommer, Moritz Dannhauer, Sumientra Rampersad, Dana Brooks, Eugene Tunik, Deniz Erdoğmuş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Explainability in AI-enabled medical neurotechnology: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. M2M-InvNet: Human Motor Cortex Mapping From Multi-Muscle Response Using TMS and Generative 3D Convolutional Network.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Navid AkbarNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Mathew YarossiNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Marc Martinez-GostTechnical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, USA.
Marc A SommerDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Moritz DannhauerDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sumientra RampersadNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Dana BrooksNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Eugene TunikNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Deniz ErdoğmuşNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsR01HD058301 · NICHD · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, MERIANS, ALMA S · 2009 to 2021
$4.7M
Planning and Updating in Frontoparietal Networks for GraspingR01NS085122 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, TUNIK, EUGENE · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
Rational Design of TMS for NeuromodulationR01NS088674 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V, SOMMER, MARC A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058301NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085122NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A deep neural network (DNN) that can reliably model muscle responses from corresponding brain stimulation has the potential to increase knowledge of coordinated motor control for numerous basic science and applied use cases. Such cases include the understanding of abnormal movement patterns due to neurological injury from stroke, and stimulation based interventions for neurological recovery such as paired associative stimulation. In this work, potential DNN models are explored and the one with the minimum squared errors is recommended for the optimal performance of the M2M-Net, a network that maps transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex to corresponding muscle responses, using: a finite element simulation, an empirical neural response profile, a convolutional autoencoder, a separate deep network mapper, and recordings of multi-muscle activation. We discuss the rationale behind the different modeling approaches and architectures, and contrast their results. Additionally, to obtain a comparative insight of the trade-o between complexity and performance analysis, we explore different techniques, including the extension of two classical information criteria for M2M-Net. Finally, we find that the model analogous to mapping the motor cortex stimulation to a combination of direct and synergistic connection to the muscles performs the best, when the neural response profile is used at the input.

Indexed as

autoencoderconvolutional neural network (CNN)muscle synergyperformance-complexity analysisTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID32818205
PMCPMC7430758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.