Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818178›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2018

The Benefits of Honoring Patients as Teachers: A Qualitative Study.

Victoria Hayes, Robert Bing-You, Dan Pitts, Lauren Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria HayesMaine Medical Center, Department of Medical Education, Portland, ME.
Robert Bing-YouMaine Medical Center, Department of Medical Education, Portland, ME.
Dan PittsMaine Medical Center, Department of Medical Education, Portland, ME.
Lauren ManningMaine Medical Center, Department of Medical Education, Portland, ME.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical training could not occur without the contributions of patients. Few programs are available that recognize patients for their essential role in medical education, and even fewer explore their impact. The Patients as Teachers (PaT) program was developed to provide an opportunity for medical students to formally honor patients for their contributions and to evaluate their effect on students' medical education.

methodsThis qualitative study involved the evaluation of transcripts of audiotaped interviews conducted with students and their honorees following participation in the PaT program in 2015 and 2016. Two different sets of authors independently examined transcripts from each year utilizing a descriptive coding strategy. Consensus was reached on theme selection and relationships between themes explored for theory development. A third author ensured grounding of the concepts in the data analyzed.

resultsFour themes emerged: (1) appreciating humanism in medicine, (2) expressing gratitude, (3) connecting patients and students, and (4) experiencing a unique event.

conclusionThe Patients as Teachers program provides meaningful benefits to both students and patients and has the potential to infuse elements of humanism into medical training.

Identifiers

PMID32818178
PMCPMC7426128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.