Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818160›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2019

A metabocentric view of cardiac remodeling.

Bradford G Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. YAP: The nexus between metabolism and cardiac remodeling.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bradford G HillEnvirome Institute, Diabetes and Obesity Center, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Funding

Tumor Necrosis Factor Modulation of CPCsP01HL078825 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2005 to 2021
$37.6M
Project 5 - Metabolomic Analysis of AtherothrombosisP20GM103492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI · 2012 to 2017
$13.8M
TBDP30GM127607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI JONES, STEVEN P · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
Effects of Air Pollution on Stem Cell HealthR01ES028268 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HABERZETTL, PETRA, HILL, BRADFORD GUY · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Metabolic optimization of cell therapyR01HL130174 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HILL, BRADFORD GUY · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078825NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130174NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028268NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103492NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologic and pathologic stressors promote changes in metabolism that are associated with cardiac remodeling. Metabolic alterations in the heart are a summation of responses of several organs and organ systems, which transform the milieu of circulating substrates and stimuli and prompt cardiac adaptation or remodeling. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which metabolism causes cardiac remodeling remain unclear. Difficulties in delineating metabolic mechanisms of tissue remodeling are in part due to technical issues as well as to the lack of conceptual clarity with regard to causal entailment of metabolic processes. This review discusses some metabolic mechanisms by which stressors such as exercise, pregnancy, and pressure overload promote metabolism-mediated cardiac remodeling. Adopting conceptual frameworks based in relational biology and delineating hierarchies of metabolic causation could lend new insight into how metabolism coordinates cardiac remodeling.

Indexed as

exerciseglycolysisheart failurehypertrophymitochondriapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32818160
PMCPMC7430807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.