ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binocular Visual Function in Children Wearing Single-Vision or Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses Assessed with a Tablet-Based Dichoptic Platform.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Slow binocular reading during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) in children with amblyopia and the role of fixation instability.Vision research · 2025Article
- Visuo-Cognitive Executive Functions in Amblyopia and Strabismus: Associations With Function and Quality of Life.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Comparison of Worth Four Dots (W4D) and Bagolini Striated Lenses in adult suppression detection.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Fine Motor Skills, Reading Speed, and Self-Reported Quality of Life in Adults With Amblyopia and/or Strabismus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- The dichoptic contrast ordering test: A method for measuring the depth of binocular imbalance.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Suppression Scotomas and Stereoacuity in Anisometropic Amblyopia With Successfully Treated Visual Acuity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Amblyopia and the whole child.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023Review
- Distribution of Visual and Oculomotor Alterations in a Clinical Population of Children with and without Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Leveraging neural plasticity for the treatment of amblyopia.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe and evaluate an iOS application suppression test, Worth 4 Dot App (W4DApp), which was designed and developed to assess size and depth of suppression. Methods: Characteristics of sensory fusion were evaluated in 25 participants (age 12-69 years) with normal (n = 6) and abnormal (n = 19) binocular vision. Suppression zone size and classification of fusion were determined by W4DApp and by flashlight Worth 4 Dot (W4D) responses from 33 cm to 6 m. Measures of suppression depth were compared between the W4DApp, the flashlight W4D with neutral density filter bar and the dichoptic letters contrast balance index test. Results: There was high agreement in classification of fusion between the W4DApp method and that derived from flashlight W4D responses from 33 cm to 6 m (α = 0.817). There were no significant differences in success rates or in reliability between the W4DApp or the flashlight W4D methods for determining suppression zone size. W4DApp suppression zone size strongly correlated to that determined with the flashlight W4D (rho = 0.964, Conclusions: The W4DApp has potential clinical benefit in measuring suppression zone size; however, further modifications are required to improve validity of suppression depth measures. Translational Relevance: W4DApp iOS application will be a convenient tool for clinical determination of suppression characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.