Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818094›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Tissue Responses and Wound Healing following Laser Scleral Microporation for Presbyopia Therapy.

Yu-Chi Liu, Brad Hall, Nyein Chan Lwin, Ericia Pei Wen Teo, Gary Hin Fai Yam, AnnMarie Hipsley, Jodhbir S Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Correction of presbyopia.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Chi LiuTissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Brad HallAce Vision Group, Inc., Newark, CA, USA.
Nyein Chan LwinTissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Ericia Pei Wen TeoTissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Gary Hin Fai YamTissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
AnnMarie HipsleyAce Vision Group, Inc., Newark, CA, USA.
Jodhbir S MehtaTissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Singapore Eye Research Institute · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the postoperative inflammatory and wound-healing responses after laser scleral microporation for presbyopia. Methods: Thirty porcine eyes were used for the optimization of laser intensities first. Six monkeys (12 eyes) received scleral microporation with an erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and half of the eyes received concurrent subconjunctival collagen gel to modulate wound-healing response. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the laser ablation depth were evaluated. The animals were euthanized at 1, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. The limbal areas and scleras were harvested for histologic analysis and immunofluorescence of markers for inflammation (CD11b and CD45), wound healing (CD90, tenascin-C, fibronectin, and HSP47), wound contraction (α-smooth muscle actin [α-SMA]), vascular response (CD31), nerve injury (GAP43), and limbal stem cells (P63 and telomerase). Results: In the nonhuman primate study, there was a significant reduction in IOP after the procedure. Overall, the ablation depth was 76.6% to 81.2% at 1 month and slightly decreased to 71.5% to 72.7% at 9 months. Coagulative necrosis around the micropores, as well as expression of CD11b, CD45, tenascin, fibronectin, HSP47, and GAP43, was distinct at 1 month but subsided with time. Collagen gel treatment significantly suppressed the upregulation of CD11b, CD45, fibronectin, and tenascin-C. The expression of CD90, α-SMA, and CD31 was minimal in all eyes. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the course of inflammatory and wound-healing responses following laser scleral microporation. The tissue responses were small and self-limited, resolved with time, and were suppressed by concurrent collagen treatment. It provides a useful understanding of this new procedure. Translational Relevance: The results would be helpful in the laser parameter modification to improve the long-term treatment stability.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyPresbyopiaAnimalsScleraSwineWound Healinglaserpresbyopiascleral wound healing

Identifiers

PMID32818094
PMCPMC7396200
OpenAlexW3009333988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.