Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32818065›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Sohail Nisar, Jeya Palan, Charles Rivière, Mark Emerton, Hemant Pandit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06835621 (Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06835621 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThammasat UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsOA Knee, TKAArmsRestricted inverse kinematic alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty, Adjusted Mechanical alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Are current total knee arthroplasty implants tested and approved for personalised alignment?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sohail NisarLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-3900
Jeya PalanLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK.
Charles RivièreMSK Lab - Imperial College London, White City Campus, London, UK.
Mark EmertonLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK.
Hemant PanditLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBLister Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinematic alignment (KA) is an alternative philosophy for aligning a total knee replacement (TKR) which aims to restore all three kinematic axes of the native knee.Many of the studies on KA have actually described non-KA techniques, which has led to much confusion about what actually fits the definition of KA.Alignment should only be measured using three-dimensional cross-sectional imaging. Many of the studies looking at the influence of implants/limb alignment on total knee arthroplasty outcomes are of limited value because of the use of two-dimensional imaging to measure alignment, potentially leading to inaccuracy.No studies have shown KA to be associated with higher complication rates or with worse implant survival; and the clinical outcomes following KA tend to be at least as good as mechanical alignment.Further high-quality multi-centre randomized controlled trials are needed to establish whether KA provides better function and without adversely impacting implant survival. Cite this article:

Indexed as

arthroplastykinematic alignmentknee

Identifiers

PMID32818065
PMCPMC7407864
OpenAlexW3039247340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.