ArticleBioactive materials2021
Preservation of alveolar ridge height through mechanical memory: A novel dental implant design.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanobiology of orofacial tissues: principles, mechanisms, and therapeutic applications.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- An axolotl limb regeneration-inspired strategy to enhance alveolar bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Effects of concentrated growth factor combined with Bio-Oss bone powder on guided bone regeneration in the maxillary posterior region.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- The efficiency of two different synthetic bone graft materials on alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a split-mouth study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- A Biodegradable Tissue Adhesive for Post-Extraction Alveolar Bone Regeneration under Ongoing Anticoagulation-A Microstructural Volumetric Analysis in a Rodent Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Reasoning on Pore Terminology in 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Hydroxyapatite-Based Coatings on Silicon Wafers and Printed Zirconia.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Analysis of Axial Gradient Porous Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Microfabrication approaches for oral research and clinical dentistry.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2023Review
- Surface Treatment and Bioinspired Coating for 3D-Printed Implants.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irreversible marginal bone loss can hinder recovery around dental implants. Insufficient alveolar osteogenesis and stress concentration during chewing contribute to marginal bone resorption and can result in implant failure. A biomaterial with a micropore-channel structure was developed using 3D printing technology. This design facilitated bony ingrowth and provided similar mechanical stimulation at the implant neck during mastication to a natural tooth. The micropore channels provided a guiding structure for bone mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation without the need for growth factors. Specifically, this was achieved through mechanical transduction by F-actin remodeling and the activation of Yes-associated protein (YAP). The implants were verified in a canine dental implant surgery model, which demonstrated the promising use of biomaterial-based dental implants in future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.