Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817743›Full record

ArticleField crops research2020

CERES-Maize model for simulating genotype-by-environment interaction of maize and its stability in the dry and wet savannas of Nigeria.

A A Adnan, J Diels, J M Jibrin, A Y Kamara, A S Shaibu, P Craufurd, Abebe Menkir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Field crops research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A A AdnanDepartment of Agronomy, Bayero University Kano, 70001, Kano, Nigeria.
J DielsDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Division of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
J M JibrinCentre for Dryland Agriculture (CDA), Bayero University Kano, 70001, Kano, Nigeria.
A Y KamaraInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. c/o IITA Ltd, Carolyn House, 26 Dingwall Road, Croydon CR9 3 EE, United Kingdom.
A S ShaibuDepartment of Agronomy, Bayero University Kano, 70001, Kano, Nigeria.
P CraufurdInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) House United Nations Avenue, Gigiri P.O. Box 1041-00621, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abebe MenkirInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. c/o IITA Ltd, Carolyn House, 26 Dingwall Road, Croydon CR9 3 EE, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When properly calibrated and evaluated, dynamic crop simulation models can provide insights into the different components of genotype by environment interactions (GEIs). Modelled outputs could be used to complement data from multi-environment trials. Field experiments were conducted in the rainy and dry seasons of 2015 and 2016 across four locations in maize growing regions of Northern Nigeria using 16 maize varieties planted under near-optimal conditions of moisture and soil nitrogen. The CERES-Maize model was calibrated using data from three locations and two seasons (rainy and dry) and evaluated using data from one location and two seasons all in 2015. Observed data from the four locations and two seasons in 2016 was used to create eight different environments. Two profile pits were dug in each location and were used separately in the simulations for each environment to provide replicated data for stability analysis in a combined ANOVA. The effects of the environment, genotype and GEI were highly significant (p = 0.001) for both observed and simulated grain yields. The environment explained 67 % and 64 % of the variations in observed and simulated grain yields respectively. The variance component of GEI (13 % for observed and 15 % for simulated) were lower but still considerable when compared to that of genotypes (19 % for observed and 21 % for simulated). From the stability analysis of the observed and simulated grain yields using six different stability models, three models (ASV, Ecovalence, and Sigma) ranked Ife Hybrid as the most stable variety. The slope of the regression (bi) model ranked Sammaz 11 as the most stable variety, while the Shukla model ranked Sammaz 28 as the most stable variety. Long-term seasonal analysis with the CERES-Maize model revealed that early and intermediate maturing varieties produce high yields in both wet and dry savannas, early and extra-early varieties produce high yields only in the dry savannas, while late maturing varieties produce high yields only in the wet savannas. When properly calibrated and evaluated, the CERES-Maize model can be used to generate data for GEI and stability studies of maize genotype in the absence of observed field data.

Indexed as

CERES-Maize modelGenotype by environment interactionStability analysis

Identifiers

PMID32817743
PMCPMC7255407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.