Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817692›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Gaining traction: Promising shifts in gender norms and intimate partner violence in the context of a community-based HIV prevention trial in South Africa.

Ann Gottert, Julie Pulerwitz, Nicole Haberland, Rhandzekile Mathebula, Dumisani Rebombo, Kathryn Spielman, Rebecca West, Aimée Julien, Rhian Twine, Dean Peacock and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann GottertPopulation Council/Project SOAR, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-9478
Julie PulerwitzPopulation Council/Project SOAR, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Nicole HaberlandPopulation Council/Project SOAR, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Rhandzekile MathebulaSonke Gender Justice, Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa.
Dumisani RebomboSonke Gender Justice, Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa.
Kathryn SpielmanPopulation Council/Project SOAR, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Rebecca WestDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Aimée JulienDepartment of Epideiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Rhian TwineMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Dean PeacockSonke Gender Justice, Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa.
Mi-Suk Kang DufourDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
F Xavier Gómez-OlivéMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Audrey PettiforDepartment of Epideiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Sheri A LippmanDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Kathleen KahnMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Population Council · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZASonke Gender Justice · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Activating Treatment as Prevention through Community Mobilization in South AfricaR01MH103198 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIPPMAN, SHERI ANN, PETTIFOR, AUDREY · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Effects of Cash Transfer and Community Mobilization in Young South African WomenR01MH087118 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETTIFOR, AUDREY · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087118NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103198PEPFARWellcome Trust 058893/Z/99/AWellcome Trust 069683/Z/02/ZWellcome Trust 085477/B/08/ZWellcome Trust 085477/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV and violence prevention programs increasingly seek to transform gender norms among participants, yet how to do so at the community level, and subsequent pathways to behavior change, remain poorly understood. We assessed shifts in endorsement of equitable gender norms, and intimate partner violence (IPV), during the three-year community-based trial of Tsima, an HIV 'treatment as prevention' intervention in rural South Africa.

methodsCross-sectional household surveys were conducted with men and women ages 18-49 years, in 8 intervention and 7 control communities, at 2014-baseline (n = 1,149) and 2018-endline (n = 1,189). Endorsement of equitable gender norms was measured by the GEM Scale. Intent-to-treat analyses assessed intervention effects and change over time. Qualitative research with 59 community members and 38 staff examined the change process.

resultsNearly two-thirds of men and half of women in intervention communities had heard of the intervention/seen the logo; half of these had attended a two-day workshop. Regression analyses showed a 15% improvement in GEM Scale score over time, irrespective of the intervention, among men (p<0.001) and women (p<0.001). Younger women (ages 18-29) had a decreased odds of reporting IPV in intervention vs. control communities (aOR 0.53; p<0.05). Qualitative data suggest that gender norms shifts may be linked to increased media access (via satellite TV/smartphones) and consequent exposure to serial dramas modeling equitable relationships and negatively portraying violence. Tsima's couple communication/conflict resolution skills-building activities, eagerly received by intervention participants, appear to have further supported IPV reductions.

conclusionsThere was a population-level shift towards greater endorsement of equitable gender norms between 2014-2018, potentially linked with rapid escalation in media access. There was also an intervention effect on reported IPV among young women, likely owing to improved couple communication. Societal-level gender norm shifts may create enabling environments for interventions to find new traction for violence and HIV-related behavior change.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansInterpersonal RelationsIntimate Partner ViolenceMalePreventive Health ServicesSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID32817692
PMCPMC7446856
OpenAlexW3080223005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.