Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32817677›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Distribution, antifungal susceptibility pattern and intra-Candida albicans species complex prevalence of Candida africana: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sanaz Aghaei Gharehbolagh, Bahareh Fallah, Alireza Izadi, Zeinab Sadeghi Ardestani, Pooneh Malekifar, Andrew M Borman, Shahram Mahmoudi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of Closely RelatedPolish journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differentiation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2021
    Article
  10. AIMS microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanaz Aghaei GharehbolaghDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahareh FallahDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza IzadiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab Sadeghi ArdestaniDepartment of Mycology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Pooneh MalekifarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Andrew M BormanPublic Health England UK National Mycology Reference Laboratory, Southmead Hospital Bristol, Medical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology (MRC CMM), University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Shahram MahmoudiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-8659

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N006364/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida africana is a pathogenic species within the Candida albicans species complex. Due to the limited knowledge concerning its prevalence and antifungal susceptibility profiles, a comprehensive study is overdue. Accordingly, we performed a search of the electronic databases for literature published in the English language between 1 January 2001 and 21 March 2020. Citations were screened, relevant articles were identified, and data were extracted to determine overall intra-C. albicans complex prevalence, geographical distribution, and antifungal susceptibility profiles for C. africana. From a total of 366 articles, 41 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Our results showed that C. africana has a worldwide distribution. The pooled intra-C. albicans complex prevalence of C. africana was 1.67% (95% CI 0.98-2.49). Prevalence data were available for 11 countries from 4 continents. Iran (3.02%, 95%CI 1.51-4.92) and Honduras (3.03%, 95% CI 0.83-10.39) had the highest values and Malaysia (0%) had the lowest prevalence. Vaginal specimens were the most common source of C. africana (92.81%; 155 out of 167 isolates with available data). However, this species has also been isolated from cases of balanitis, from patients with oral lesions, and from respiratory, urine, and cutaneous samples. Data concerning the susceptibility of C. africana to 16 antifungal drugs were available in the literature. Generally, the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal drugs against this species were low. In conclusion, C. africana demonstrates geographical variation in prevalence and high susceptibility to antifungal drugs. However, due to the relative scarcity of existing data concerning this species, further studies will be required to establish more firm conclusions.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandida albicansCandidiasis, VulvovaginalDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceVaginaAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID32817677
PMCPMC7440629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.