ArticlePloS one2020
Different amount of training affects body composition and performance in High-Intensity Functional Training participants.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07531953 (Nutritional Knowledge and Characteristics of HYROX Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nutritional Knowledge and Characteristics of HYROX Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physiological effects of regular CrossFitFrontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of 12 weeks of High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on serum mitokines and metabolic risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized control trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Psychobehavioral profiles, competitive progression, and nutritional characteristics in CrossFit® athletes across a national competitive season.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Block periodization vs. traditional periodization in high-intensity functional training: a randomized crossover study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- High Intensity Functional Training in Hybrid Competitions: A Scoping Review of Performance Models and Physiological Adaptations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) for Assessment of Hydration Status: A Comparison between Endurance and Strength University Athletes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Somatotype and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis of Italian CrossFit® practitioners.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Research on the effect of different aerobic activity on physical fitness and executive function in primary school students.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Effects of Mediterranean Diet Combined with CrossFit Training on Trained Adults' Performance and Body Composition.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Changes in Body Composition and Strength after 12 Weeks of High-Intensity Functional Training with Two Different Loads in Physically Active Men and Women: A Randomized Controlled Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on body composition and the relationship of the latter with performance are not well defined. In this work we investigated, by means of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, the relative proportions of fat-, lean soft tissue-, and mineral mass in CrossFit® (CF, a popular mode of HIFT) participants (n = 24; age, 28.2 ± 3.39 y; BMI, 25.3 ± 2.04 kg/m2) with at least 1 year of CF training experience and weekly amount of training > 10 h/w (n = 13; Higher Training, HT) or < 10 h/w (n = 11; Lower Training, LT) as well as age- matched and BMI-matched physically active controls (CHT, CLT). Performance was assessed in the "Fran" workout. Data were analyzed by one-way or repeated measures ANOVA where needed. Association between variables was assessed with the Pearson's correlation coefficient r. Partial correlation was used where needed. Results showed that HT performed better than LT in the "Fran" (P < 0.001) and they had higher whole-body bone mineral density (P = 0.026) and higher lean soft mass (P = 0.002), and borderline lower percent fat mass (P = 0.050). The main difference between CF participants (HT, LT) and their respective controls (CHT, CLT) was a lower adiposity in the former. In CF participants, performance positively correlated with appendicular lean soft tissue mass (P = 0.030). It can be concluded that, in CF participants, a higher amount of weekly training improves most notably lean body mass and increases performance in association with increased skeletal muscle mass. CF participation is especially effective in reducing fat mass vs. age- and BMI-matched physically active controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.